PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

2024 RECOVER Guidelines: Advanced Life Support. Evidence and knowledge gap analysis with treatment recommendations for small animal CPR.

Journal:
Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)
Year:
2024
Authors:
Wolf, Jacob et al.
Affiliation:
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences · United States

Plain-English summary

This study looked at how to improve advanced life support (ALS) for dogs and cats during emergencies, like cardiac arrest. Researchers reviewed existing information and created treatment recommendations based on what they found, focusing on how to manage different heart rhythms and when to use specific medications. They found that high doses of epinephrine should be avoided after long periods of CPR, and they suggested using certain drugs like atropine only once when necessary. However, they noted that the overall quality of evidence is low because there isn't enough clinical data on pets, which makes it hard to be completely certain about the recommendations. In summary, while the guidelines provide useful insights, the lack of solid evidence means that veterinarians should use caution when applying these recommendations.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence and devise clinical recommendations on advanced life support (ALS) in dogs and cats and to identify critical knowledge gaps. DESIGN: Standardized, systematic evaluation of literature pertinent to ALS following Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Prioritized questions were each reviewed by Evidence Evaluators, and findings were reconciled by ALS Domain Chairs and Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) Co-Chairs to arrive at treatment recommendations commensurate to quality of evidence, risk:benefit relationship, and clinical feasibility. This process was implemented using an Evidence Profile Worksheet for each question that included an introduction, consensus on science, treatment recommendations, justification for these recommendations, and important knowledge gaps. A draft of these worksheets was distributed to veterinary professionals for comment for 4 weeks prior to finalization. SETTING: Transdisciplinary, international collaboration in university, specialty, and emergency practice. RESULTS: Seventeen questions pertaining to vascular access, vasopressors in shockable and nonshockable rhythms, anticholinergics, defibrillation, antiarrhythmics, and adjunct drug therapy as well as open-chest CPR were reviewed. Of the 33 treatment recommendations formulated, 6 recommendations addressed the management of patients with nonshockable arrest rhythms, 10 addressed shockable rhythms, and 6 provided guidance on open-chest CPR. We recommend against high-dose epinephrine even after prolonged CPR and suggest that atropine, when indicated, is used only once. In animals with a shockable rhythm in which initial defibrillation was unsuccessful, we recommend doubling the defibrillator dose once and suggest vasopressin (or epinephrine if vasopressin is not available), esmolol, lidocaine in dogs, and/or amiodarone in cats. CONCLUSIONS: These updated RECOVER ALS guidelines clarify the approach to refractory shockable rhythms and prolonged CPR. Very low quality of evidence due to absence of clinical data in dogs and cats continues to compromise the certainty with which recommendations can be made.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38924633/