Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Bitless bridles do not stop horses' throat collapse during exercise
By Fretheim-Kelly, Zoe et al.·Published in Equine veterinary journal·2021·Faculty of Veterinary Medicine·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: A bitless bridle does not limit or prevent dynamic laryngeal collapse.
- Species:
- horse
Plain-English summary
A group of nine horses with breathing problems due to dynamic laryngeal collapse (DLC) were tested to see if using a bitless bridle would help them breathe better compared to a traditional snaffle bit bridle. The results showed that while the bitless bridle did not significantly improve their breathing during exercise, it also didn't make things worse. The study suggests that the way the horse's head and neck are positioned while riding, rather than the type of bridle used, plays a bigger role in causing these breathing issues. Overall, switching to a bitless bridle may not be a solution for horses suffering from DLC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bits have often been incriminated as a cause of upper respiratory tract obstruction in horses; however, no scientific studies are available to confirm or refute these allegations. Clinical signs of dynamic laryngeal collapse associated with poll flexion (DLC) are induced when susceptible horses are ridden or driven into the bit. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether use of Dr Cook'sBitless Bridle, instead of a conventional snaffle bit bridle, would reduce the severity of DLC in affected horses measured objectively using inspiratory tracheal pressures. STUDY DESIGN: Intervention study using each horse as its own control in a block randomised order. METHODS: Nine Norwegian Swedish Coldblooded trotters previously diagnosed with DLC were exercised on two consecutive days using a standardised high-speed treadmill protocol with either a conventional bridle with a snaffle bit, or Dr Cook'sBitless Bridle. Head and neck position, rein tension, inspiratory tracheal pressure measurements, and laryngeal videoendoscopy recordings were obtained. A heart rate greater than 200 bpm, and similar degrees of poll flexion/head height, had to be achieved in both bridles for the individual horse's data to be included for comparison. RESULTS: Seven horses' data met the inclusion criteria. The change in mean inspiratory tracheal pressure between free and flexion phases in the bitless bridle (-15.2 ± 12.3 cmHO) was significantly greater (P < .001) than in the snaffle bit bridle (-9.8 ± 7.9 cmHO). Mean inspiratory pressure during the free phase was significantly (P < .001) more negative with the snaffle bit bridle (-32.3 ± 6.3 cmHO), vs the bitless bridle (-28.5 ± 6.9 cmHO). Mean pressures in flexion phase, snaffle bridle (-42.1 ± 10.8 cmHO), vs bitless bridle (-43.7 ± 15.6 cmHO) where not significantly different between bridles (P = .2). MAIN LIMITATION: Small sample size due to difficulty recruiting suitable clinical cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study could not provide any clear evidence that the effect of a snaffle bit in a horse's mouth influences the development or severity of DLC. Instead, head and neck angles induced by rein tension seem to be the key event in provoking DLC in susceptible horses.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32449540/