Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Does enteric coating improve enzyme treatment for dogs
By Mas, Aran et al.·Published in BMC veterinary research·2012·School of Veterinary Science, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: A blinded randomised controlled trial to determine the effect of enteric coating on enzyme treatment for canine exocrine pancreatic efficiency.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 38 dogs with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), a condition where the pancreas doesn't produce enough enzymes for digestion, were treated with either an enteric-coated enzyme supplement or a regular enzyme supplement for 56 days. Both groups showed improvements in weight and overall health, but the dogs receiving the enteric-coated enzymes gained more weight and had better responses to treatment. By the end of the study, both treatments were effective, but the enteric-coated version seemed to provide a bit more benefit without any reported side effects.
People also search for: dog EPI treatment · enteric-coated enzymes for dogs · how to help my dog gain weight with EPI
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Enzyme treatment is the mainstay for management of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) in dogs. 'Enteric-coated' preparations have been developed to protect the enzyme from degradation in the stomach, but their efficacy has not been critically evaluated. The hypothesis of the current study was that enteric coating would have no effect on the efficacy of pancreatic enzyme treatment for dogs with EPI.Thirty-eight client-owned dogs with naturally occurring EPI were included in this multicentre, blinded, randomised controlled trial. Dogs received either an enteric-coated enzyme preparation (test treatment) or an identical preparation without the enteric coating (control treatment) over a period of 56 days. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in either signalment or cobalamin status (where cobalamin deficient or not) between the dogs on the test and control treatments. Body weight and body condition score increased in both groups during the trial (P<0.001) but the magnitude of increase was greater for the test treatment compared with the control treatment (P<0.001). By day 56, mean body weight increase was 17% (95% confidence interval 11-23%) in the test treatment group and 9% (95% confidence interval 4-15%) in the control treatment group. The dose of enzyme required increased over time (P<0.001) but there was no significant difference between treatments at any time point (P=0.225). Clinical disease severity score decreased over time for both groups (P=0.011) and no difference was noted between groups (P=0.869). No significant adverse effects were reported, for either treatment, for the duration of the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Enteric coating a pancreatic enzyme treatment improves response in canine EPI.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22839732/