Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Comparing three parasite treatments for dogs in northern Australia
By Raw, Cameron et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2024·Melbourne Veterinary School, Australia·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: A comparative field efficacy trial of three treatment programs against endo- and ectoparasites in naturally infected dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs in northern Australia were treated for internal parasites like hookworms and external parasites like fleas and ticks. The treatments included oral medications and topical solutions, with ivermectin showing the best results for internal parasites, eliminating 95% of the eggs. However, for external parasites, afoxolaner and imidacloprid/flumethrin collars were more effective, with around 80% of dogs free of fleas and ticks shortly after treatment. Overall, ivermectin and moxidectin were effective for internal parasites, while afoxolaner and collars were best for external ones.
People also search for: dog hookworm treatment · flea and tick prevention for dogs · ivermectin for dogs · moxidectin for dogs
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Tropical climates in remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in northern Australia are conducive to the transmission of canine helminths such as hookworms, as well as ectoparasites such as fleas and ticks. In addition to their veterinary importance, these parasites may present a zoonotic risk either directly, or as potential vectors for bacterial pathogens. These factors necessitate efficacious and effective antiparasitic treatment programs for community dogs. METHODS: A cluster-randomised trial was performed on three islands in the Torres Strait to examine the short-term efficacy and medium-term effectiveness of three treatment programs. Treatments administered included oral oxibendazole/praziquantel (Paragard) and oral afoxolaner (Nexgard); topical moxidectin/imidacloprid (Advocate) and imidacloprid/flumethrin collars (Seresto); and off-label oral ivermectin (Bomectin). Canine faecal samples were collected and examined for endoparasites by faecal flotation and real-time PCR at baseline, 7-11 days after treatment and 6 months later. RESULTS: The proportion of dogs positive forat baseline and negative at day 7-11 was 9% (95% CI 4.4-17.4) for dogs treated with oxibendazole, 56.4% (95% CI 41-70.7) for moxidectin, and 89.7% (95% CI 73.6-96.4) for ivermectin. Faecal flotation results showed a greater than 90% egg reduction in 29.2% (95% CI 19.9-40.5) of dogs treated with oxibendazole, 79.4% (95% CI 63.2-89.7) for moxidectin, and 95% (95% CI 76.4-99.1) for off-label ivermectin. Elimination of ectoparasite infestation was observed at day 7-11 in 69.9% (95% CI 56.7-80.1) of dogs treated with afoxolaner, 80% (95% CI 60.9-91.1) with imidacloprid/flumethrin collars, and 0% (95% CI 0-11.7) for off-label ivermectin. Mixed effects modelling revealed only treatment group to be significantly associated with outcome measures. DISCUSSION: Based on these study results, the poor efficacy of oxibendazole againstrenders it inept for treatment, while ivermectin and moxidectin were suitable. Ivermectin was unsuitable for ectoparasite treatment due to its poor efficacy, while afoxolaner and imidacloprid/flumethrin collars appear suitable.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39301281/