PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Comparing two ear infection treatments for dogs with otitis externa

By Rougier, Sandrine et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2005·V&#xe9, France·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: A comparative study of two antimicrobial/anti-inflammatory formulations in the treatment of canine otitis externa.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 140 dogs with ear infections (otitis externa) were treated with either a new ear drop medication (MCD) or a standard treatment (Surolan) to see which worked better. Both treatments were effective, but MCD had a higher cure rate and provided better pain relief and less pus and odor by day 14. Both medications were well tolerated by the dogs, meaning they didn't cause any significant side effects. Overall, MCD showed better results in treating the ear infections compared to Surolan.

People also search for: dog ear infection treatment · best ear drops for dogs · MCD vs Surolan for dog ear infections

Abstract

The efficacy and tolerability of a marbofloxacin-clotrimazole-dexamethasone otic suspension (MCD) was compared with a standard topical treatment using a phase III clinical trial protocol. In a total of 140 dogs with clinical signs of acute or subacute otitis externa, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, Enterobacteriaceae and Malassezia were isolated from samples taken at inclusion to identify the causative pathogen; a further sample was collected in the event of failure or relapse, and from dogs (at day 14) for which Pseudomonas species had been isolated at inclusion. One group received MCD (10 drops per affected ear) once daily and a second received Surolan (containing polymyxin B, miconazole and prednisolone) (5 drops per affected ear), twice daily. Each group received treatment for 7 or 14 days according to the clinical outcome on day 7. Efficacy and tolerability were evaluated on days 7, 14 and, if necessary, 28 for dogs treated for 14 days. The trial demonstrated equivalence of both treatments in terms of efficacy, with a cure rate of 58.3% for MCD and 41.2% for Surolan. Both medications were equally well tolerated by dogs, but MCD was superior in terms of pain relief, decrease in pus quantity and smell, response rate and investigator's assessment on day 14.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16238809/