PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Detecting Mycoplasma in cat nasal samples with PCR vs culture

By Johnson, Lynelle R et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc·2004·Department of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: A comparison of routine culture with polymerase chain reaction technology for the detection of Mycoplasma species in feline nasal samples.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A group of 20 cats had nasal samples taken to check for Mycoplasma, a type of bacteria that can cause respiratory issues. The tests included both traditional cultures and a newer method called polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In 6 cats, the culture found Mycoplasma, and PCR confirmed these results while also identifying one case where the culture was negative but PCR detected the bacteria. Overall, PCR proved to be a quick and effective way to find Mycoplasma in nasal samples, even spotting a rare type that didn’t grow in culture.

People also search for: cat nasal discharge Mycoplasma · cat respiratory infection treatment · how to test for Mycoplasma in cats

Abstract

Nasal flush samples were collected from 20 cats and submitted for Mycoplasma culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Nasal biopsy samples were also obtained from each cat and simultaneously evaluated for Mycoplasma by standard culture and PCR. Concordance of the test results was determined through calculation of the kappa statistic. In 6 cats, nasal flush samples were culture positive for Mycoplasma. PCR was positive in each culture-positive cat and also positive in 1 flush sample that was culture negative. DNA sequencing of the PCR product from the culture negative flush sample identified the organism as Mycoplasma arginini. All other flush samples that were culture negative were also PCR negative (kappa = 0.89). Nasal biopsy samples from 7 cats were culture positive for Mycoplasma, and all were PCR positive. Biopsy samples that were culture negative for Mycoplasma were also PCR negative (kappa = 1.0). Results of culture and PCR for both nasal flush and biopsy were concordant in 19 of 20 cats, and PCR was able to identify an unusual Mycoplasma species that did not grow in culture. In most cats, organisms could be detected in either nasal flush or biopsy samples. In this study, PCR provided rapid and sensitive detection of Mycoplasma species in nasal samples from cats and detected 1 organism that did not grow in culture.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15305751/