PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Lateral larynx surgery may affect swallowing in dogs

By Mathews, Kyle G et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2022·Department of Clinical Sciences·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: A lateral surgical approach to the larynx may impair cervical esophageal function in dogs.

Species:
dog
Breathing & coughDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of 12 healthy male Beagles underwent surgery for laryngeal paralysis, a condition that affects their ability to breathe and swallow. Two different surgical techniques were tested: a standard approach and a muscle-sparing method. After surgery, some dogs in both treatment groups developed issues with their esophagus, which could lead to problems like aspiration pneumonia. The study did not find significant differences in swallowing function between the two techniques, suggesting that both methods may carry similar risks.

People also search for: dog laryngeal paralysis surgery · Beagle swallowing problems · aspiration pneumonia in dogs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether muscle-sparing laryngoplasty results in fewer changes in swallowing function compared to standard surgical treatment for laryngeal paralysis. ANIMALS: 12 clinically normal sexually intact male Beagles. PROCEDURES: Group A dogs (n = 4) had a standard approach to the larynx, with left arytenoid cartilage lateralization. Group B dogs (n = 4) had a muscle-sparing laryngoplasty performed with the thyropharyngeus muscle fibers bluntly separated, and the cricoarytenoideus dorsalis muscle spared. Pre- and 24-hour postoperative fluoroscopic swallowing studies were performed and graded. Larynges were harvested after humane euthanasia, and glottic area was measured. Group C dogs (n = 4) acted as controls, with surgical dissection ending lateral to the thyropharyngeus muscle, arytenoid lateralization not performed, and the dogs not euthanized. The study was performed between October 15, 2011 and May 15, 2021. RESULTS: Changes in pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter function were not detected in any group. There was no difference in glottic area between treatment groups. Aspiration of liquid was not a consistent finding. Two dogs in each treatment group developed moderate to severe cervical esophageal paresis. This did not occur in control dogs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We found no evidence to support our hypothesis that muscle-sparing laryngoplasty results in less severe changes in swallowing function compared to a standard technique. The cervical esophageal paresis identified in both treatment groups could increase the risk of postoperative aspiration pneumonia in dogs treated for laryngeal paralysis via a lateral approach to the larynx. Further study to determine the frequency, cause, and duration of esophageal dysfunction is warranted.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35895756/