Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
New way to define tunnel portal failure using strength reduction
By Hua C et al.·2026·School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, China·View original on Europe PMC →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: A new criterion for defining tunnel portal failure using the strength reduction method.
Plain-English summary
This study looks at how to better determine when tunnel portals (the entrances to tunnels) fail using a new method called the variational criterion. Researchers found that traditional methods for assessing tunnel stability have various drawbacks, such as being complicated or lacking clear standards. The new variational criterion is easier to use and gives accurate results, with only a small error margin compared to other methods. It also works well regardless of different factors like the size of the tunnel or the materials used. Overall, this new approach could be a helpful tool for engineers working on tunnel safety.
Abstract
Recently, the application of the strength reduction method (SRM) to stability analysis of tunnel portals has become a trend. The key to employing the SRM lies in selecting an appropriate failure criterion. It is analyzed that the application characteristics of traditional criteria. Additionally, it is proposed that a new failure criterion-the variational criterion. Based on the numerical models, the effectiveness of the aforementioned work is validated. The results show that the displacement mutation at characteristic points (Criterion Ⅰ) is cumbersome to apply and involves a substantial workload. The plastic zone penetration (Criterion Ⅱ) lacks quantitative and clear standards. The calculation program non-convergence (Criterion Ⅲ) lacks a mechanical explanation. The energy mutation (Criterion Ⅳ) can effectively reflect the failure mechanism of the model. But it requires considerable computational effort. The variational criterion addresses these shortcomings while providing results with a relative error of no more than 1.6% compared to other criteria. Moreover, this applicability and accuracy are largely unaffected by mesh densities, geometric dimensions, strength reduction factor intervals, mechanical parameters, and convergence criteria. The variational criterion offers a comprehensive indicator-the variational value, and employs a clear discrimination method-judging the sign of the variational value. This criterion can provide a new reference for failure discrimination in tunnel portals.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Europe PMC: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/41955190