PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How to detect neutrophil traps in septic dogs using microscopy

By Li, Ronald H L et al.·Published in BMC veterinary research·2018·Department of Veterinary Surgical and Radiological Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: A novel approach to identifying and quantifying neutrophil extracellular trap formation in septic dogs using immunofluorescence microscopy.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with sepsis had samples taken from their lungs and abdomen to check for a specific immune response called neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Researchers found NETs in all samples from the septic dogs, which helps to understand how their immune systems are reacting to infection. This method of using special microscopy to identify and measure NETs could be valuable for diagnosing and studying sepsis in dogs.

People also search for: dog sepsis symptoms · neutrophil extracellular traps in dogs · how to treat septic dog

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Canine neutrophils release neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in response to lipopolysaccharide but NETs from clinical septic dogs had not been identified. The primary aim is to describe the methodology of identifying and quantifying neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in cytology samples of septic foci in dogs with sepsis using immunofluorescence microscopy. Cytology samples including endotracheal tracheal wash (ETW), bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), abdominal and pleural effusion collected from 5 dogs (3 septic, 2 non-septic) were fixed, permeabilized and stained for myeloperoxidase (MPO), citrullinated histone H3 (citH3) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Fluorescence microscopy was used to identify and quantify NETs in 10 random views at 40× magnification. NETs were identified based on co-localization of MPO, citH3 and cfDNA. NETs were quantified as a ratio (number of NETs: number of neutrophils). Neutrophils were identified based on cytoplasmic MPO, cellular diameter and nuclear morphology. RESULTS: NETs were identified and quantified in all cytology samples collected from septic dogs. A small number of NETs was documented in one dog with sterile chronic bronchitis. No NETs were found in sterile abdominal effusion collected from one dog with congestive heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: Immunofluorescence microscopy could be a useful tool for the study of NETs in dogs with clinical sepsis.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29945605/