Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Ozone ear treatment compared to antibiotics for dog ear infections
By Ünlü, Elif et al.·Published in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2026·Department of Surgery·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: A novel approach to treating canine otitis externa with medical ozone: A comparative clinical, cytological and microbiological research.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 27 dogs with ear infections (otitis externa) were treated with either ozone therapy, a common antibiotic ear drop, or a veterinary ear solution. The dogs receiving ozone therapy showed complete recovery, with no bacterial growth detected in their ears, while only a third of those treated with the antibiotic drops improved. The ozone treatment not only eliminated the infection but also significantly reduced pain and itching. This suggests that ozone therapy could be a safe and effective alternative for treating ear infections in dogs, potentially reducing the need for antibiotics.
People also search for: dog ear infection treatment · ozone therapy for dogs · antibiotic ear drops for dogs
Abstract
Otitis externa (OE), an inflammation of the external ear canal, is common in both humans and companion animals and often requires prolonged antimicrobial therapy. Ozone has gained attention for its antimicrobial, antiviral, and antioxidant properties in dermatologic disorders, although its optimal dose and route of administration remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of topical ozone therapy for managing OE compared with conventional antimicrobial treatments. Twenty-seven client-owned dogs with OE were enrolled in an open-label, prospective, controlled clinical trial and assigned to three groups: ozone (Group I), ciprofloxacin drops (Group II), and a veterinary otic solution with florfenicol, terbinafine, and mometasone furoate (Group III). Clinical assessments (OTIS-3, otoscopy, pain, pruritus, cytology) were performed on days 0, 7, 14, and 21, with bacteriological evaluations on days 0 and 21. Based on OTIS-3, treatment success rates were 100 % in Group I, 33.33 % in Group II, and 66.66 % in Group III. Significant improvements in OTIS-3, otoscopy, pain, and pruritus scores were observed in Group I compared to Group II (p < 0.05). Cytological improvement was significant in Groups I (p < 0.001) and III (p = 0.003). Microbiological analysis confirmed the complete absence of bacterial growth in Group I, effectively eliminating Staphylococcus pseudointermedius, Proteus mirabilis, Bacillus spp., Citrobacter braakii, Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci, Escherichia coli, Dermacoccus nishiomiyaensis, and multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. These findings highlight the potential of topical ozone therapy as a safe and effective option for the management of otitis externa, with important implications for reducing antimicrobial use and mitigating antimicrobial resistance.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41389996/