PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

New skin test to find bacteria on dogs with skin disease

By Rich, Naomi et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2022·Animal Skin and Allergy Clinic, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: A novel cytological technique for bacterial detection on canine skin.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 30 dogs with skin issues, including atopic dermatitis and signs of bacterial infections, were tested using a new method for collecting skin samples called slurry preparation. This technique was found to be better at detecting bacteria compared to traditional methods like impression smears and tape strips. While it didn't outperform the tape-strip method for detecting a type of yeast called Malassezia, it still showed promise for identifying bacterial infections, which can help veterinarians treat conditions like pyoderma more effectively. This new approach could be a useful option for diagnosing skin infections in dogs.

People also search for: dog skin infection treatment · atopic dermatitis in dogs · pyoderma diagnosis in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytological examination of the skin is an important diagnostic technique in dermatology for disease diagnosis and monitoring of treatment. Impression smear and tape-strip preparation are gold standard cytological techniques. This study introduces a novel cytological method, slurry preparation, in which debris collected from the skin surface is macerated in warm sterile water and dried on the slide. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To compare organism yield between a novel and two standard cytological collection techniques by evaluating bacteria and Malassezia yeast counts. ANIMALS: Thirty client-owned dogs diagnosed with atopic dermatitis and lesions consistent with pyoderma and/or Malassezia dermatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective, blinded comparison study, dermatological lesions from each dog were sampled using impression smear, tape-strip and slurry preparation methodologies. Ten random reticle fields per lesion, accounting for a total area of 6.25 × 10 mm(equivalent to ˜5% of a typical ×40 field), were evaluated by light microscopy for each cytological method. Bacterial and Malassezia organisms were measured as counts/sample. The slurry preparation was compared to each of the standard methodologies separately using paired Student's t-tests. RESULTS: The slurry preparation was demonstrated to be more sensitive than gold standard techniques in detecting bacteria, with mean differences of 12.7 and 13.5 additional bacteria per cytological sample, compared to the impression and tape-strip preparations, respectively. The slurry preparation did not differ significantly in detecting Malassezia organisms compared with impression smear preparation. The tape-strip preparation was demonstrated to be more sensitive than the slurry preparation in the detection of Malassezia organisms, finding a mean difference of 0.22 more organisms per sample. CONCLUSION: Slurry preparation presents advantages over the gold standard techniques in the detection of bacteria which can help to manage canine pyoderma more appropriately. Performing a slurry preparation in cases of suspected canine pyoderma could be considered as an alternative to the gold standard techniques.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34734448/