Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
New non-azole cream cuts yeast and paw dermatitis in dogs
By Sjöström, Ylva et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2018·Blue Star Animal Hospital·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: A novel non-azole topical treatment reduces Malassezia numbers and associated dermatitis: a short term prospective, randomized, blinded and placebo-controlled trial in naturally infected dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
Eighteen dogs with itchy, irritated paws due to a yeast infection called Malassezia dermatitis were treated with a new topical solution for two weeks. The dogs received the treatment on one paw and a placebo on the other, and the results showed a significant decrease in the yeast numbers and improvement in the condition of the treated paws. Owners found the product easy to use, and there were no reported side effects. This new treatment could be a helpful alternative for dogs suffering from this common skin issue.
People also search for: dog itchy paws treatment · Malassezia dermatitis in dogs · topical treatment for dog skin problems
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malassezia yeast overgrowth on the skin is a common and often recurrent cause of dermatitis in dogs; it can be an exacerbating factor of atopic dermatitis. Anti-fungal drugs have been a standard treatment, but there is some concern that resistance may be evolving in a spectrum of Malassezia species. Safe, efficient and easy-to-use alternatives are needed. OBJECTIVES: To assess if a commercially available topical non-azole solution applied to paws affected by Malassezia-associated dermatitis (MAD), could ameliorate Malassezia numbers and associated signs over a short term (14 day) trial. ANIMALS: Eighteen dogs with MAD affecting at least two paws. METHODS: The study design was prospective, randomized, blinded and placebo-controlled, using a split-body protocol. Dogs were treated once daily with the test solution on one paw and placebo on the other. Dogs were examined at days 0 and 14 ± 3. The primary end-point was Malassezia numbers assessed cytologically. Secondary end-points were clinical scores for lesion severity and pruritus as assessed by a pruritus Visual Analog Scale (PVAS). Owner compliance and adverse effects were assessed. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction in Malassezia numbers and clinical scores for paws treated with the test solution versus placebo. No statistical difference in PVAS was found. CONCLUSION: Daily topical application of the test solution was effective in reducing the Malassezia burden, as well as improving clinical scores in dogs with MAD of the paws. No adverse effects were reported and owners described the product as either "easy" or "very easy" to use.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28913896/