PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Toceranib and vinblastine chemo for dog bladder cancer response

By Rippy, Sarah B et al.·Published in BMC veterinary research·2016·University of Missouri, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: A pilot study of toceranib/vinblastine therapy for canine transitional cell carcinoma.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with transitional cell carcinoma (a type of bladder cancer) received a combination of two chemotherapy drugs, toceranib and vinblastine, to see if it would help shrink their tumors. Over 16 weeks, three out of five dogs showed some response to the treatment, with two having partial shrinkage of their tumors and one maintaining stable disease. While both ultrasound and CT scans were used to monitor the tumors, CT scans provided more consistent results among different operators. Unfortunately, the combination treatment did not lead to significantly better outcomes than other therapies.

People also search for: dog bladder cancer treatment · transitional cell carcinoma in dogs · vinblastine for dog cancer · toceranib for dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective therapies for transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) are limited, with objective response rates to most chemotherapeutic regimens below 20%. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biologic activity of combined toceranib phosphate and vinblastine chemotherapy for treatment of TCC. A secondary objective was to compare the utility of Computed Tomography (CT) and abdominal ultrasound (AUS) in tumor response assessments. RESULTS: Dogs with TCC received vinblastine at 1.6 mg/m2 every 2 weeks and toceranib at 2.5-2.75 mg/kg on Monday/Wednesday/Friday. Tumor monitoring was achieved through CT and AUS. Five patients completed the 16-week study. Based on AUS assessments, 3 dogs experienced biologic response to therapy including partial responses (PR, n = 2) and stable disease (SD, n = 1). Based on CT, 5 dogs experienced a biologic response (n = 2 PR, n = 3 SD). Both imaging modalities (ultrasound and CT) were found to provide repeatable measurements between operators, however agreement between operator measurements was greater when CT images were used to assess tumor size. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of toceranib and vinblastine did not result in improved response rates. While agreement in tumor volume assessments between both AUS and CT were excellent between operators, this did not extend to assessment of tumor response. The higher rate of concordance between operators when assessing response to treatment with CT suggests that CT should be considered for future clinical trials involving canine bladder TCC to improve the accuracy and repeatability of tumor measurement. The data suggest that response to therapy as assessed by AUS or CT do not predict duration of clinical response.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27855679/