Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Safety of new antioxidant nanoparticle treatment tested in four dogs
By Robinson, Kelsey et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2020·Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: A Pilot Study on the Safety of a Novel Antioxidant Nanoparticle Delivery System and Its Indirect Effects on Cytokine Levels in Four Dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
Four healthy dogs were tested with a new antioxidant treatment designed to help with spinal cord injuries. After receiving the treatment, all dogs showed some side effects, like slow heart rate, low blood pressure, excessive drooling, pale gums, and involuntary urination, which are signs of a reaction to the treatment. Two of the dogs had mild changes in their blood tests, but these returned to normal within a week. While some inflammation markers decreased initially, they were elevated again by the end of the week. Fortunately, there were no long-term health issues, and further studies are needed to ensure the treatment is safe for dogs with actual spinal cord injuries.
People also search for: dog spinal cord injury treatment · antioxidant for dogs · side effects of dog medication · dog blood test results · dog drooling after treatment
Abstract
Acute spinal cord injury consists of a primary, traumatic event followed by a cascade of secondary events resulting in ongoing cell damage and death. There is great interest in prevention of these secondary effects to reduce permanent long-term neurologic deficits. One such target includes reactive oxygen species released following injury, which can be enzymatically converted into less harmful molecules by superoxide dismutase and catalase. Canine intervertebral disc herniation has been suggested as a naturally occurring model for acute spinal cord injury and its secondary effects in people. The aims of this study were to test the safety of a novel antioxidant delivery system in four healthy dogs and to indirectly test effect of delivery via cytokine measurement. All dogs experienced adverse events to some degree, with two experiencing adverse events considered to be severe. The clinical signs, including combinations of bradycardia, hypotension, hypersalivation, pale gums, and involuntary urination, were consistent with complement activation-related pseudoallergy (CARPA). CARPA is a well-known phenomenon that has been reported to occur with nanoparticle-based drug delivery, among other documented causes. Two dogs also had mild to moderate changes in their blood cell count and chemistry, including elevated alanine transferase, and thrombocytopenia, which both returned to normal by day 7 post-administration. Cytokine levels trended downwards over the first 3 days, but many were elevated at measurement on day 7. Intradermal testing suggested catalase as a potential cause for reactions. No long-term clinical signs were observed, and necropsy results revealed no concerning pathology. Additional evaluation of this product, including further characterization of reactions to catalase containing components, dose-escalation, and desensitization should be performed before evaluation in clinically affected dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32851027/