Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How can negative pressure therapy help my pet's surgical wound?
By Perry, Karen L et al.·Published in BMC veterinary research·2015·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: A preliminary study of the effect of closed incision management with negative pressure wound therapy over high-risk incisions.
Plain-English summary
This study looked at how a special treatment called negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) can help with healing after surgery on the limbs of pets, especially when the surgery is more complicated and has a higher risk of problems. In the study, twenty pets that had surgery for serious fractures or joint fusions were divided into two groups: one received NPWT for a day after surgery, while the other did not. The results showed that the pets treated with NPWT had less swelling and less fluid coming from their wounds compared to those who did not receive this treatment. However, there were no significant differences in pain levels or overall complications between the two groups. Overall, using NPWT seemed to help reduce swelling and discharge, but more research is needed to see if it also lowers discomfort and complications after surgery.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Certain postoperative wounds are recognised to be associated with more complications than others and may be termed high-risk. Wound healing can be particularly challenging following high-energy trauma where wound necrosis and infection rates are high. Surgical incision for joint arthrodesis can also be considered high-risk as it requires extensive and invasive surgery and postoperative distal limb swelling and wound dehiscence are common. Recent human literature has investigated the use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) over high-risk closed surgical incisions and beneficial effects have been noted including decreased drainage, decreased dehiscence and decreased infection rates. In a randomised, controlled study twenty cases undergoing distal limb high-energy fracture stabilisation or arthrodesis were randomised to NPWT or control groups. All cases had a modified Robert-Jones dressing applied for 72 h postoperatively and NPWT was applied for 24 h in the NPWT group. Morphometric assessment of limb circumference was performed at six sites preoperatively, 24 and 72 h postoperatively. Wound discharge was assessed at 24 and 72 h. Postoperative analgesia protocol was standardised and a Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Score (GCPS) carried out at 24, 48 and 72 h. Complications were noted and differences between groups were assessed. RESULTS: Percentage change in limb circumference between preoperative and 24 and 72 h postoperative measurements was significantly less at all sites for the NPWT group with exception of the joint proximal to the surgical site and the centre of the operated bone at 72 h. Median discharge score was lower in the NPWT group than the control group at 24 h. No significant differences in GCPS or complication rates were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Digital swelling and wound discharge were reduced when NPWT was employed for closed incision management. Larger studies are required to evaluate whether this will result in reduced discomfort and complication rates postoperatively.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26552901/