Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Toceranib phosphate shows promise for treating dog nasal cancer
By Ehling, Tara Jean et al.·Published in Veterinary and comparative oncology·2022·Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: A prospective, multi-centre, Veterinary Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study reveals potential efficacy of toceranib phosphate (Palladia) as a primary or adjuvant agent in the treatment of canine nasal carcinoma.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with nasal tumors were treated with a medication called toceranib phosphate (Palladia) either alone or alongside radiation therapy to see which approach worked better. The results showed that dogs receiving both toceranib and radiation had a higher overall response rate (79.4%) compared to those getting radiation alone (68.9%). While the median survival times varied, with toceranib alone averaging 298 days, toceranib plus radiation showed promising results without increasing side effects from the radiation. This suggests that toceranib could be a beneficial addition to the treatment of nasal tumors in dogs.
People also search for: dog nasal tumor treatment · toceranib for dogs · radiation therapy for dog cancer
Abstract
Radiation is the standard of care for dogs with nasal tumours. The addition of another therapy that could improve outcome without increasing toxicity is attractive. Medical therapy that could offer better outcome than maximally tolerated dose chemotherapy when radiation therapy (RT) is not possible or is declined is also attractive. This article reports the findings from a prospective, multi-centre, non-randomized, Veterinary Radiation Therapy Oncology Group clinical trial designed to evaluate whether toceranib phosphate (toceranib) has primary activity and if the addition of toceranib to RT could positively impact outcome. Owner's discretion determined enrolment in toceranib alone or toceranib + RT arm. Historical controls for radiation alone were selected from patients treated with identical RT and imaging protocols. Responses were evaluated with pre-treatment and week-16 CT scans. RT total dose of 42 Gy was completed in 10 fractions. Sixty-three dogs enrolled from 10 study sites. Overall response rates (CR + PR) were significantly improved in the toceranib + RT (79.4%) and RT alone (68.9%) arms over toceranib alone (22%) (p = .011). Clinical benefit rates (CR + PR + SD) were significantly improved in the toceranib + RT arm over the RT alone arm at 97.3% and 79.2% respectively (p = .036). Treatment with toceranib alone, toceranib + RT and RT alone resulted in median survival times of 298, 615 and 368 days respectively, but were not statistically significantly different (p = .0502). Adverse events associated with toceranib administration did not potentiate the RT side effect profile. Toceranib appears to have primary activity against nasal carcinoma.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34655275/