PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Postoperative surgical site infection rates in dogs and cats

By Eugster, Simone et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2004·Companion Animal Hospital·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: A prospective study of postoperative surgical site infections in dogs and cats.

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs and cats that underwent surgery were monitored for signs of infection at their suture removal appointments. About 5.8% of the pets showed signs of inflammation or infection in their surgical wounds. Key factors that increased the risk of infection included longer surgery times, more people in the operating room, and having a dirty surgical site. However, giving antibiotics before surgery helped reduce the risk. Understanding these factors can help veterinarians take steps to prevent infections in pets after surgery.

People also search for: dog surgery infection signs · cat surgical site infection prevention · antibiotics for dog surgery recovery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) rate and to identify associated predictive factors. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. ANIMALS: Dogs and cats that had surgery (1010 interventions) during 58 weeks from April 1999 to June 2000. METHODS: Data sheets were completed by clinicians. Patients were controlled for clinical evidence of SSI at suture removal. Two definitions of SSI ("infection" and "infection/inflammation") were developed specifically for this study and used for statistical analysis. Logistic regression models were built in order to identify significant predictive factors for SSI. RESULTS: Wounds with "infection/inflammation" occurred in 5.8% and "infected" wounds in 3% of patients. The outcome "infection" was associated with 3 major risk factors (duration of surgery, increasing number of persons in the operating room, dirty surgical site) and 1 protective factor (antimicrobial prophylaxis). The outcome "infection/inflammation" was associated with 6 significant factors (duration of anesthesia, duration of postoperative intensive care unit stay, wound drainage, increasing patient weight, dirty surgical site, and antimicrobial prophylaxis). CONCLUSIONS: SSI frequency in companion animals is comparable with the frequency observed in human surgical patients. Several significant predictive factors for SSI in small animals surgery were identified. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Baseline information for SSI surveillance in our hospital and for comparison with other studies was defined. The factors identified may help to predict infections in surgical patients and to take adequate preventive measures for patients at risk.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15362994/