Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
A protocol for a systematic review of the psychosocial effects of experiencing compassion from others and its interpretation through secular and religious frameworks.
By Lazzari C et al.·2026·School of Health Sciences, United Kingdom·View original on Europe PMC →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Plain-English summary
This study is about understanding how receiving compassion from others affects people's mental and emotional well-being. It aims to look at both the psychological effects of this compassion and how people interpret these experiences based on their religious or secular beliefs. The researchers will review various studies involving adults and will focus on those that provide data on the effects of receiving compassion, while excluding studies that only look at self-compassion or compassion fatigue. They plan to gather information from several academic databases and will assess the quality of the studies they include. Ultimately, the goal is to create models that help people understand and practice compassion in ways that are sensitive to different cultural and spiritual perspectives.
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>Compassion is widely studied as a prosocial motivator with recognized mental health benefits, yet the psychosocial effects of receiving compassion remain underexplored. Interpretive frameworks-whether religious or secular-may influence how individuals perceive and emotionally respond to compassionate acts.<h4>Objectives</h4>To systematically review (1) the psychosocial effects of receiving compassion from others, and (2) how recipients interpret these experiences through secular or religious frameworks.<h4>Methods</h4>This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines and is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Eligible studies will be empirical, involving adult participants in any setting, and using qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-method designs. Studies will be excluded if they focus solely on self-compassion, compassion fatigue, or lack psychological outcome data related to receiving compassion. Information sources include PubMed, Psychological Information Database (PsycINFO), Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E) tool for nonrandomized studies, the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for quasi-experimental and qualitative designs, and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for mixed-methods designs. Data synthesis will follow a convergent integrated approach combining thematic and narrative techniques. Where feasible, pooled effect sizes and forest plots will be presented.<h4>Discussion</h4>This review will explore how receiving compassion-interpreted through secular or religious lenses-affects psychological well-being and social interactions, including potential reductions in distress, increases in resilience, and prosocial behaviors. It aims to develop culturally sensitive and spiritually aware models of compassionate interaction, with relevance for clinical practice, public health ethics, and interdisciplinary education.<h4>Systematic review registration</h4>PROSPERO 2025 CRD420251107986. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251107986 .
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Europe PMC: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/41736168