PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Long-term outcomes of bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation surgery

By Ubertazzi E et al.·2026·Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires·View original on Europe PMC

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Over a Decade of Clinical Experience.

Movement & joints

Plain-English summary

This study looked at a surgical procedure called bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation (BSSLF), which is used to repair certain types of pelvic organ prolapse. Researchers followed 391 patients over a decade to see how well the procedure worked, especially when it was done without removing the uterus (total hysterectomy). They found that 94.3% of patients who had the procedure without a hysterectomy were cured, while those who had other surgical methods had a lower success rate of 83.2%. The study also noted that not doing a specific additional procedure (anterior colporrhaphy) increased the chances of treatment failure. Overall, the BSSLF procedure was very effective in the long term, especially when performed without a hysterectomy.

Abstract

<h4>Introduction and hypothesis</h4>Bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation (BSSLF) is a well-established procedure for apical prolapse repair, yet surgical approaches and outcomes vary. This study presents the first large-cohort, long-term retrospective evaluation of BSSLF using the sling-like mesh Splentis®. We analyse anterior BSSLF (ABSSLF) outcomes without total hysterectomy and compare them with other surgical approaches used in clinical practice.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 391 patients treated with Splentis between 2012 and 2023 at two referral centres were stratified into group A (ABSSLF without total hysterectomy, n = 248) and group B (other approaches including posterior fixation and/or total hysterectomy, n = 143). Outcomes were evaluated at intermediate (1-3 years, n = 256) and long-term follow-up (> 3 years, n = 135). Primary endpoint was composite cure: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) point C < 0, absence of bulge symptoms and no retreatment. Secondary endpoints included POP-Q changes, patient-reported symptoms and complications.<h4>Results</h4>Overall cure was 90.3% (95% CI 86.9-93.0%): group A, 94.3% (95% CI 90.7-96.9%); group B, 83.2% (95% CI 76.1-88.9%). Group A remained stable at long-term follow-up, whereas group B declined by 16.2 percentage points. Omission of concomitant anterior colporrhaphy was associated with higher odds of treatment failure (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.3-6.8; p = 0.010). Most complications were Clavien-Dindo ≤ II. Mesh-related complications were 4.8% (95% CI 2.5-8.3%) in group A and 5.6% (95% CI 2.4-10.7%) in group B.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The ABSSLF procedure using Splentis showed high long-term effectiveness when used for hysteropexy or cervicopexy, that is, without prior/concomitant total hysterectomy. Other approaches showed lower yet favourable outcomes, highlighting the versatility of the device and the importance of patient selection.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on Europe PMC: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42059946