Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Complications after forkless tibial tuberosity advancement in 329 dogs
By Matchwick, Alexandra I M et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2021·Anderson Moores Veterinary Specialists, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: A retrospective evaluation of complications associated with forkless tibial tuberosity advancement performed in primary care practice.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 329 dogs underwent a surgery called forkless tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA) to help with knee problems, and about 15% experienced complications afterward. Most issues were minor, but some required further surgery. Interestingly, dogs that had a larger cage size relative to their body weight had fewer meniscal injuries, which are common knee problems. Overall, the surgery was found to be safe when performed by experienced veterinarians, with a low rate of serious complications.
People also search for: dog knee surgery complications · forkless TTA recovery · meniscal injury in dogs after surgery
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report postoperative complications associated with forkless tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA) performed in primary care veterinary practice and to compare results with previous publications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Three hundred seventy-four forkless TTAs in 329 dogs performed by six nonspecialist veterinarians. METHODS: Medical records of dogs treated with a standard forkless TTA (2013-2016) and with at least 12 months of postoperative follow-up were reviewed. Complications recorded by the referring practice or the operating veterinarian were classified as minor (medically treated) or major (surgically treated). RESULTS: Complications occurred in 57 of 374 (15.2%) TTAs; 28 (7.5%) complications were major, and 29 (7.7%) complications were minor. Postliminary meniscal injuries were documented in 12 of 374 (3.2%) TTAs (12/57 major complications) and were more common when the ratio of cage size to bodyweight was ≤0.25 (P = .019). Mean TTA (cage size) was greater in this population than what has been previously reported for a lower median bodyweight. CONCLUSION: The incidence of major complications was low and within the range previously reported for TTA in referral practice after adjusting for study design. The magnitude of advancement was greater, and the incidence of postliminary meniscal injury was lower than what has been previously reported, after accounting for dogs that had a preliminary meniscal injury or medial meniscal release. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Forkless TTA may be successfully performed by experienced veterinarians in primary care practice with a low rate of complications. The incidence of postliminary meniscal injury may be reduced by a greater degree of advancement of the tibial tuberosity.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33085159/