PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Risk factors for bone refracture after forelimb surgery in small dogs

By Muroi, Norihiro et al.·Published in Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology : V.C.O.T·2025·Department of Veterinary Surgery, Japan·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: A Retrospective Study of Risk Factors Associated with Refracture after Repair of Radial-Ulnar Fractures in Small-Breed Dogs.

Species:
dog
Movement & jointsDogs

Plain-English summary

A small dog with a broken leg underwent surgery to fix the fracture using plates and screws. Unfortunately, some dogs experienced a second fracture after the initial repair, particularly at the site of the original injury. The study found that the risk of refracture was linked to the position of the screws and the growth of the bone. To help prevent this issue, veterinarians might consider using smaller screws or leaving the plate in place if the bone is thinner or less dense.

People also search for: dog leg fracture recovery · small dog refracture after surgery · dog plate removal complications

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:  The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for refracture after radial union in small-breed dogs. STUDY DESIGN:  In our retrospective study, medical records of radial-ulnar fracture cases in small dogs treated with plates and screws were reviewed. General information and postoperative course (days until confirmed radial fracture healing, with or without ulnar union, time to final follow-up, with or without plate removal and refracture) were recorded. The fracture line location, screw positions, radial thickness and width, and pixel values throughout the postoperative periods were obtained from the radiographs. The affected limbs were classified into non-plate removal (P) and plate removal (R) groups. RESULTS:  Refracture occurred in 5 of the 141 limbs at the most distal screw in the P group and 5 of the 40 limbs at the same site as the initial fracture in the R group. Multivariate analysis indicated that refracture was linked to the amount of relative change with growth in the position of the most distal screw in the P group, with pixel value and radial thickness ratios at the same site as the initial fracture in the R group. CONCLUSION:  Reducing the screw diameter relative to the radial width to the appropriate extent may be considered in cases where the screw positioned at the most distal end of the radius is expected to be relatively proximal as the distal radius grows; not removing the plate may be considered in cases with a decreased radial thickness or bone mineral density beneath the plate during plate removal.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39209288/