Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Boar attacks causing blunt and penetrating injuries in dogs
By Surleraux, Claire et al.·Published in Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association·2025·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: A Retrospective Study on Boar-Induced Trauma in 42 Dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 42 dogs that suffered injuries from boar attacks were treated at a veterinary hospital. Most of the dogs had blunt trauma, while some experienced penetrating or combined injuries. The survival rate was high, with 90.5% of the dogs recovering, especially those with only blunt injuries. Dogs with more severe injuries, like penetrating trauma, had a lower survival rate, but all dogs that only had penetrating injuries survived. Treatment focused on managing the type and severity of injuries, which helped many dogs return to health.
People also search for: dog boar attack injury treatment · dog trauma survival rate · dog penetrating injury recovery
Abstract
Boar attack-associated trauma (BAAT) in dogs was reviewed by assessing the injury type (blunt, penetrating, or combined), distribution, Animal Trauma Triage (ATT) score, and prognosis. We conducted a university teaching hospital retrospective study of the hospital medical records from December 2013 to January 2024 of all dogs presented for BAAT. Forty-two cases were identified: 36 (85.7%) had blunt trauma, 13 (30.9%) had penetrating trauma, and 7 (16.7%) had combined trauma. The mean ATT score (± standard deviation [SD]) was significantly higher in penetrating (4.3 ± 1.2) and combined trauma (5.0 ± 1.0) than in blunt (2.5 ± 1.3) trauma. Similarly, the mean ATT score was significantly higher in multiple (4.2 ± 1.4) than in single (2.5 ± 1.4) lesions. The mean ATT score was 3.0 (± 1.6) in survivors and 5.5 (± 0.71) in dogs that died naturally. The number of observations was too low to reach statistical significance. The survival rate was 100% (6/6) with only penetrating, 89.7% (26/29) with only blunt, and 85.7% (6/7) with combined lesions. ATT scores were higher in cases that suffered penetrating or combined and multiple injuries. Blunt trauma affecting a single region was more common than penetrating or multiple injuries. The overall survival rate was 90.5%.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41190685/