PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Ultrasound accuracy for diagnosing ear infections in cats

By Chan, Tim et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2025·Tufts University Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Accuracy and Feasibility of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Otitis Media in Cats.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A group of 32 cats with suspected ear infections (otitis media) underwent ultrasound to check for fluid in their ears. The ultrasound was quick and most cats tolerated it well, allowing the vet to identify fluid in 22 ears and air in 41 ears. The results showed that ultrasound was very accurate, correctly diagnosing the condition in most cases, although there were a couple of false negatives due to very small amounts of fluid that were hard to detect. Overall, ultrasound proved to be a reliable tool for diagnosing ear infections in cats.

People also search for: cat ear infection symptoms · ultrasound for cat ear problems · how to treat otitis media in cats

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Otitis media (OM) is diagnosed via imaging or, in some cases, otoscopic evaluation, by detecting fluid in the tympanic bulla (TB). In cats, the bulla septum divides the TB into ventromedial (VMC) and dorsolateral (DLC) compartments, with ultrasound restricted to imaging the VMC only. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of ultrasound in diagnosing naturally occurring OM in cats, using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the reference standard. ANIMALS: Thirty-two privately owned cats (64 ears) with and without OM were enrolled in the study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, CT or MRI confirmed fluid (OM) or air (normal) in the TB, while ultrasound imaged the VMC for air or fluid. Performance statistics for ultrasound in diagnosing OM were calculated. RESULTS: Bulla ultrasound took an average of 3.5 min to complete and 23 cats were awake. Ultrasound detected air in the VMC in 41 ears, fluid in 22 ears and acoustic shadowing in one ear owing to TB wall thickening, precluding the detection of gas or fluid. Thirty-nine middle ears were air-filled and 25 ears had fluid based on CT/MRI. Two false negatives resulted from undetectable scant fluid lines. Ultrasonographic data of 63 ears (ear with acoustic shadow was excluded) showed the following: sensitivity (92%), specificity (100%), positive predictive value (100%), negative predictive value (95%) and accuracy (97%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ultrasound was rapid, well-tolerated and reliably differentiated fluid from air in the VMC, diagnosing OM in most cats. False negatives arose from scant fluid. Acoustic shadowing may represent chronic OM.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40767337/