PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Accuracy of flash glucose monitoring and delay in cats

By Del Baldo, Francesca et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2021·Department of Veterinary Medical Science, Italy·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Accuracy of a flash glucose monitoring system in cats and determination of the time lag between blood glucose and interstitial glucose concentrations.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A group of diabetic cats was monitored using a new glucose monitoring system called the FreeStyle Libre, which measures glucose levels in the fluid just under the skin. The study found that while the system wasn't perfectly accurate according to strict standards, it was still reliable enough for everyday use in managing diabetes in cats. However, pet owners should be aware that there can be a delay in readings, especially when blood sugar levels are changing quickly. This means that during those times, the readings from the device might not match the actual blood sugar levels right away.

People also search for: diabetic cat glucose monitor · FreeStyle Libre for cats · cat blood sugar monitoring · how to manage cat diabetes · glucose levels in diabetic cats

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The FreeStyle Libre (Abbott Laboratories) is a flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS) that measures interstitial glucose concentration (IG). The system is factory-calibrated, easy to use, inexpensive, and could be useful for monitoring diabetic cats. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the analytical and clinical accuracy of the FGMS in cats and establish the lag-time between IG and blood glucose concentration (BG). ANIMALS: Twenty client-owned diabetic cats and 7 purpose-bred healthy cats. METHODS: Prospective study. Blood glucose concentration was measured using a portable glucose meter validated for use in cats that served as a reference method for IG, as measured by FGMS. In diabetic cats, data were collected for sensor wearing time with different methods of application and accuracy across glycemic ranges. Accuracy was determined by fulfillment of ISO15197:2013 criteria. In healthy cats, lag-time between IG and BG was established after IV administration of exogenous glucose. RESULTS: Good agreement between IG and BG was obtained (r = .93). Analytical accuracy was not achieved, whereas clinical accuracy was demonstrated with 100% of the results in zones A + B of the Parkes consensus error grid analysis. In the immediate 30 minutes after an IV bolus of glucose, when BG was increasing rapidly (approximately 2%/min), IG increased slowly, resulting in a difference of as much as 579 mg/dL, and no positive correlation between BG and IG was found. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The FGMS did not fulfill ISO requirements but is sufficiently accurate for glucose monitoring in cats, while considering the lag between IG and BG during periods of rapid changes in BG.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33991129/