PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How accurate is needle arthroscopy for diagnosing meniscal tears

By Evers, Johanna S et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2023·University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Accuracy of needle arthroscopy for the diagnosis of medial meniscal tears in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 26 dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR) underwent a quick procedure called needle arthroscopy to check for tears in the medial meniscus, a part of the knee. This method was found to be highly accurate, with a 95% success rate in identifying tears and 100% specificity. While the visibility of the meniscus was lower compared to traditional arthroscopy, the needle technique was faster and caused less discomfort. The dogs did not show any improvement in lameness immediately after the needle procedure. Overall, needle arthroscopy is a promising option for diagnosing meniscal tears in dogs with knee injuries.

People also search for: dog knee injury diagnosis · CCLR treatment options · meniscal tear symptoms in dogs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of needle arthroscopy (NA) for the diagnosis of medial meniscal tears in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial. ANIMALS: Twenty-six client-owned dogs. METHODS: Dogs with CCLR and scheduled to undergo tibial plateau leveling osteotomy were recruited for the study. Needle arthroscopy was performed by an experienced surgeon; the same dog subsequently underwent standard arthroscopy (SA) by another experienced surgeon who was blinded to the NA findings. The SA arthroscopy findings were used as the gold standard. Arthroscopy time, visibility of the menisci, ability to probe the menisci, and the presence of meniscal tears were recorded for both arthroscopies. The degree of lameness before and after NA was subjectively quantified. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity to diagnose medial meniscal tears with NA was 95% and 100%, respectively. Visibility of the menisci was lower (P&#x2009;<&#x2009;.01), probing of the lateral meniscus was harder (P&#xa0;=&#xa0;.0017), and procedure time was shorter (P&#xa0;=&#xa0;.073) with NA when compared to SA. The lameness scores did not differ before and after NA (P&#xa0;=&#xa0;.25). CONCLUSION: Needle arthroscopy could be performed rapidly with low morbidity, and had high accuracy for detecting medial meniscal tears in dogs with CCLR. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Needle arthroscopy is a promising minimally invasive technique for diagnosing medial meniscal tears in dogs with CCLR.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35560359/