Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Side effects and results of venom allergy shots in 82 dogs
By Ewing, Trenton S et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2022·Animal Dermatology Clinic, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Adverse events associated with venomous insect immunotherapy and clinical outcomes in 82 dogs (2002-2020).
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 82 dogs undergoing venom immunotherapy (VIT) for insect sting allergies was monitored for side effects and treatment effectiveness. While 26 dogs experienced mild gastrointestinal upset during the therapy, there were no severe reactions or deaths reported. After being stung in real-life situations, 87.8% of the dogs showed reduced severity of their allergic reactions compared to before starting treatment. Overall, VIT was found to be a safe and effective way to help dogs avoid serious allergic reactions to insect stings.
People also search for: dog insect sting allergy treatment · venom immunotherapy side effects in dogs · dog allergic reaction to insect sting
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited information is known on adverse events and efficacy associated with venomous insect immunotherapy (VIT) in canine patients. OBJECTIVES: To assess adverse events associated with VIT and perceived efficacy of VIT. ANIMALS: Records from 82 client-owned animals which received VIT were assessed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of records from 2002 to 2020. Clinical history, adverse events during therapy and observations following field stings were collected from all records. Patients were grouped into reactors and nonreactors based on whether or not an adverse event had occurred during therapy. Records were evaluated to determine if a field sting had occurred and the severity of the reaction was compared to pretreatment reaction. RESULTS: Of 82 patients that were identified, 26 experienced a minimum of one adverse event. No deaths or severe anaphylactic reactions were reported. The most common adverse event was gastrointestinal upset. The overall reaction rate per injection was 2.8%. Only variation in sensitisation level (the minimum concentration of venom which elicited a positive intradermal reaction) was significantly different between groups (P = 0.014). Forty-one field challenges in 26 patients were documented. Therapy reduced the severity of reactions in 87.8% of challenges. No deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: Venom immunotherapy appears to be a safe and efficacious treatment for prevention of anaphylaxis due to insect stings in canine patients.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34414617/