PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

New calcium treatment shows promise for dog osteoarthritis pain

By Sarig-Rapaport, Hadas et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2024·Animal Health Department·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Amorphous calcium carbonate as a novel potential treatment for osteoarthritis in dogs: a pilot clinical study.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 41 dogs with osteoarthritis (OA) participated in a study to see if a new treatment called amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) could help with their pain and mobility. After 56 days, more dogs receiving ACC showed improvements in their pain levels and ability to move compared to those given a placebo, although the differences weren't statistically significant. Overall, ACC was found to be safe, with no serious side effects reported. The researchers suggest that further studies with more dogs are needed to confirm these findings and better understand ACC's potential benefits for dogs with OA.

People also search for: dog osteoarthritis treatment · amorphous calcium carbonate for dogs · how to help my dog with joint pain

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) is a potential new treatment for canine osteoarthritis (OA) with novel mechanisms based on local pH modulation and targeting bone remodeling, inflammation, and pain. The aim of this pilot exploratory clinical study was to obtain initial data on the potential efficacy and safety of ACC in OA dogs and to determine if further investigation was appropriate using similar assessment methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled pilot study, 41 client-owned dogs were allocated in a 2:1 ratio to ACC: placebo given orally for 56&#x2009;days. Efficacy assessments included improvements in pain and mobility using owner questionnaires [Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI), Client Specific Outcome Measure (CSOM), and Veterinary Orthopedic Scores (VOS)]. Safety in the study population was monitored by veterinary examinations, clinical pathology, and adverse events. RESULTS: Fifty-three dogs were screened, of which 41 enrolled and served for the safety assessment. Thirty-six dogs were found evaluable for initial efficacy assessment. Three dogs given placebo (21.4%) and one given ACC (4.5%) were removed before day 56 due to owner-perceived pain and were considered treatment failures. There were no serious adverse events or clinically significant treatment-related effects in the study. Overall, ACC was found safe in the small study population. On day 56, proportionally more ACC than placebo dogs were treatment successes based on CBPI (45.5% vs. 21.4%) and CSOM (63.6% vs. 30.8%, respectively); however, these differences were not statistically significant (&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.15 and 0.06, respectively). On day 56, within the ACC group but not the placebo group, the CBPI, CSOM, and VOS assessments were lower compared to day 0 and day 14 (&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05). LIMITATIONS: The relatively small number of dogs limited the statistical power of the pilot study in evaluating the efficacy and safety of ACC. CONCLUSION: Study results support the conduct of larger, appropriately powered studies using similar assessments to confirm whether ACC may be a safe and effective treatment for OA in dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38983767/