Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Testing a Western blot blood test for food allergies in dogs
By Maina, Elisa et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2018·Ghent University of Veterinary Medicine·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: An assessment of a Western blot method for the investigation of canine cutaneous adverse food reactions.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs suspected of having food allergies underwent testing to see if a blood test could help diagnose their condition. The study involved 25 dogs with food reactions and 13 without, and they were tested for reactions to various hydrolyzed diets. Unfortunately, the blood test was not effective in accurately identifying food allergies, as it only correctly identified one out of fifteen allergic dogs. The researchers concluded that while the test might help in choosing a diet for elimination trials, it shouldn't be relied upon for diagnosing food allergies in dogs.
People also search for: dog food allergy symptoms · how to test for dog food allergies · best diet for dog with food allergies
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adverse food reaction (AFR) is diagnosed with a two month elimination diet (ED), followed by challenge with the original food. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate reactivity of selected EDs and performance of a Western blot serological test for the diagnosis of AFR. ANIMALS: Twenty five food reactive (FR) and 13 non food reactive (NFR) privately owned dogs. METHODS: Sera were tested for antibodies against hydrolyzed poultry feather (RCA), hydrolyzed soy (PHA), hydrolyzed fish (FUH), limited antigen horse and potato (THP), fresh horse meat and the offending food for each FR dog as documented by provocative challenge. RESULTS: Fourteen sera were negative and two positive to all foods. Sera from five of 13 NFR and three of 25 FR dogs were reactive to hydrolyzed foods. The RCA diet was recognized by four of 38, FUH by six of 38 and PHA by one of 28 samples. THP was recognized by 14 of 33 and fresh horse by one of ten dogs that had never eaten horse meat. The test correctly identified one of 15 dogs allergic to FUH. Twenty of 25 FR sera were negative for the dogs' respective offending foods (20% sensitivity), whereas four of 13 NFR sera were positive to the dogs' usual diets (69% specificity). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Western blot analysis cannot be considered as a valid tool for the diagnosis of AFR; it may serve as an aid in selecting an ED.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29624757/