An ex-vivo quantitative assessment to determine the optimal aortotomy closure technique.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After performing an aortotomy, there are a variety of techniques utilized for suture closure. There is no published data comparing the efficacy of various suture techniques. The goal of this study is to provide an ex-vivo quantitative assessment of resistance to leakage and dehiscence for three aortotomy closure techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ex-vivo model was developed utilizing explanted porcine aorta. Aortotomies were closed using one of three techniques: 1) single layer baseball stitch 2) double layer baseball stitch 3) horizontal mattress stitch with a top layer baseball stitch. The aorta was pressurized with saline using an apparatus which captured all leaked fluid. The intra-aortic pressure was adjusted over 8 increments from 110 to 375&#xa0;mmHg. Leakage rates were determined at each pressure level. Ten aortotomies were performed for each technique, resulting in 240 calculated leakage rates. RESULTS: At all pressures, the horizontal mattress group was measured to have significantly less leakage when compared to single or double layer baseball stitch closures (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.005). There was a trend towards a lower leakage rate in the double layer baseball compared to the single layer baseball stitch. However, this difference is statistically significant only at 300 and 335&#xa0;mmHg. There were no instances of rupture. CONCLUSION: This study provides the first quantitative comparison of three commonly used aortotomy closure techniques. The running horizontal mattress stitch combined with a baseball stitch provides the greatest resistance to leakage at all pressures. This technique may be superior in clinical scenarios with challenging hemostasis.