Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Better PCR test to detect ringworm in dogs and cats
By Cafarchia, Claudia et al.·Published in Medical mycology·2013·Dipartimento di Sanità, Italy·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: An improved molecular diagnostic assay for canine and feline dermatophytosis.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study tested a new method for diagnosing skin infections caused by fungi (dermatophytosis) in dogs and cats using hair samples. The researchers found that a specific PCR test was very accurate for dogs, helping to identify the type of fungus causing the infection. For cats, a different PCR method was even better at detecting these infections. This improved testing can help veterinarians quickly determine the right treatment for pets suffering from skin problems caused by these fungi.
People also search for: dog skin infection treatment · cat fungal skin disease diagnosis · how to treat ringworm in pets
Abstract
The few studies attempting to specifically characterize dermatophytes from hair samples of dogs and cats using PCR-based methodology relied on sequence-based analysis of selected genetic markers. The aim of the present investigation was to establish and evaluate a PCR-based approach employing genetic markers of nuclear DNA for the specific detection of dermatophytes on such specimens. Using 183 hair samples, we directly compared the test results of our one-step and nested-PCR assays with those based on conventional microscopy and in vitro culture techniques (using the latter as the reference method). The one step-PCR was highly accurate (AUC > 90) for the testing of samples from dogs, but only moderately accurate (AUC = 78.6) for cats. A nested-PCR was accurate (AUC = 93.6) for samples from cats, and achieved higher specificity (94.1 and 94.4%) and sensitivity (100 and 94.9%) for samples from dogs and cats, respectively. In addition, the nested-PCR allowed the differentiation of Microsporum canis from Trichophyton interdigitale (zoophilic) and geophilic dermatophytes (i.e., Microsporum gypseum or Trichophyton terrestre), which was not possible using the one step-assay. The PCRs evaluated here provide practical tools for diagnostic applications to support clinicians in initiating prompt and targeted chemotherapy of dermatophytoses.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22686247/