Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Kidney blood flow tests to check kidney damage in cats with FIP
By Vehbi Gunes et al.·Published in BMC Veterinary Research·2026·Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University, GB·View original on DOAJ →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: An updated examination of renal vascular index metrics for assessing renal involvement in feline infectious peritonitis cases
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 17 cats diagnosed with Feline Infectious Peritonitis (FIP) showed signs of kidney damage, which was assessed using ultrasound techniques. The study found that specific measurements, called renal resistive index (RRI) and pulsatility index (RPI), were significantly higher in these cats compared to healthy cats. These measurements could help veterinarians non-invasively evaluate kidney health and track any damage caused by FIP. The findings suggest that RRI and RPI may be useful tools for monitoring kidney issues in cats with this serious condition.
Abstract
Abstract This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis of renal vascular index parameters including renal resistive index (RRI) and pulsatility index (RPI) in the non-invasive diagnosis of renal damage in cats diagnosed with Feline Infectious Peritonitis (FIP). The study group comprised 17 cats diagnosed with FIP and 10 healthy cats as controls for data comparison. Hematological and biochemical assessments were detected the kidney damage in FIP cases. Comprehensive ultrasound recordings of both kidneys were acquired using abdominal ultrasound. Color and pulsed wave Doppler ultrasonographic imaging, along with RRI and RPI values derived from these assessments, as well as comprehensive total renal ultrasonography evaluations, were documented. The mean RRI and RPI values of the right kidney (0.78 ± 0.11 and 2.12 ± 0.36, respectively) and the left kidney (0.77 ± 0.11 and 1.99 ± 0.09, respectively) were significantly higher in cats with FIP compared to the control group (right kidney: 0.54 ± 0.09 and 0.79 ± 0.21, P < 0.001 and P < 0.041, respectively; left kidney: 0.55 ± 0.10 and 0.80 ± 0.23, P < 0.001 and P < 0.036, respectively). Additionally, ROC analysis also determined the sensitivity and specificity of RRI and RPI (94%, 50% and 100%, 66%) at optimal cut-off points (RRI: 0.58 and RPI: 0.63). These findings reported in the present study is important as it is the first report of vascular index parameters in cats with FIP. These findings suggest that RRI and RPI may represent valuable non-invasive hemodynamic biomarkers for evaluating renal involvement and monitoring the progression of kidney damage associated with FIP.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on DOAJ: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-05261-2