Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Validation of a heart injury blood test for dogs and cats
By Langhorn, Rebecca et al.·Published in Veterinary clinical pathology·2019·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Analytical validation of a conventional cardiac troponin I assay for dogs and cats.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study evaluated a new blood test for measuring heart injury in dogs and cats, known as the IMMULITE 2000 TnI assay. This test was compared to a more established test to see if it could reliably detect heart problems. The results showed that while the new test performed well overall, it tended to give slightly higher readings at high levels of heart injury markers. Despite this, the IMMULITE TnI assay is considered suitable for use in veterinary clinics, making it a more accessible option for diagnosing heart issues in pets.
People also search for: dog heart disease test · cat heart injury blood test · IMMULITE TnI assay for pets
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponins are gold-standard biomarkers of myocardial injury. There is a need for validation of assays with higher availability and lower costs in veterinary medicine. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the present study was to perform an analytical validation of the IMMULITE 2000 TnI assay for use in dogs and cats. A secondary aim was to evaluate its agreement with the previously validated and sensitive Siemens ADVIA Centaur TnI-Ultra assay. METHODS: Intra- and inter-assay variation, detection limits, the linearity under dilution, and a sample addition study (modified spike-and-recovery analysis) were investigated to assess analytical performance in 15 canine and 15 feline serum samples. Agreement between the assays was evaluated by correlation and Bland-Altman analyses including an additional 99 canine serum samples. RESULTS: Intra-assay variation of cTnI in canine and feline serum was 3.71% and 4.68%, while inter-assay variation was 5.88% and 6.54%, respectively. The assay performed with acceptable linearity within a clinically relevant range of serum cTnI concentrations. The sample addition study revealed insufficient recovery in the range of 71.9%-81.4% for dogs and 62.6%-75.7% for cats. This was considered to be due to a negative matrix effect. A significant correlation between the assays was found, and the Bland-Altman analysis showed acceptable agreement for a wide range of concentrations, but revealed a proportional error, with the IMMULITE TnI assay consistently measuring a higher concentration than the Centaur TnI-Ultra assay. This was relevant only at high serum cTnI concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The IMMULITE TnI assay is considered acceptable for clinical use in dogs and cats.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30536941/