Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Antibody response to feline panleukopenia vaccine in kittens
By Weidinger AK et al.·2024·LMU Small Animal Clinic, Germany·View original on Europe PMC →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Antibody response after feline panleukopenia virus vaccination in kittens with and without intestinal parasites.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 74 healthy kittens received vaccinations for feline panleukopenia virus (FPV) to see how intestinal parasites might affect their immune response. Out of these, 17 kittens had intestinal parasites, while the rest did not. Both groups showed a good response to the vaccine, with a similar number of kittens developing protective antibodies after vaccination. The study found that having intestinal parasites did not negatively impact the kittens' ability to respond to the vaccine, meaning that it's safe to vaccinate kittens even if they have these parasites.
People also search for: kitten vaccination response · intestinal parasites in kittens · do parasites affect cat vaccines
Abstract
<h4>Objectives</h4>Vaccinations should only be given to healthy cats, and deworming before vaccination is generally recommended; however, so far, no study has investigated the influence of intestinal parasitic infection on the immune response in kittens. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the antibody response to feline panleukopenia virus (FPV) vaccination in kittens with and without intestinal parasites.<h4>Methods</h4>Overall, 74 healthy kittens were included. Of these, 17 had intestinal parasites (12/17 <i>Toxocara cati</i>, 6/17 <i>Cystoisospora felis</i>, 1/17 <i>Capillaria</i> species). Both kittens with and without (n = 57) parasites received two primary kitten vaccinations with modified live FPV vaccines in a 4-week interval starting at the age of 8-12 weeks. Anti-FPV antibodies were determined at the beginning of the study (week 0) and at week 8 (4 weeks after the second vaccination) by haemagglutination inhibition. A ⩾four-fold titre increase (week 8 vs week 0) was defined as a response to vaccination. Comparison of the immune response in the kittens with and without intestinal parasites was performed using Pearson's χ<sup>2</sup> test.<h4>Results</h4>Pre-vaccination antibodies were present in 4/17 (23.5%) kittens with intestinal parasites and in 24/57 (42.1%) without parasites. A ⩾four-fold titre increase was seen in 13/17 (76.5%) kittens with parasites compared with 32/57 (56.1%) kittens without parasites. There was neither a significant difference in pre-vaccination antibodies (<i>P</i> = 0.17), nor in vaccination response (<i>P</i> = 0.13) between kittens with and without parasites.<h4>Conclusions and relevance</h4>The results indicate that asymptomatic intestinal infections with endoparasites do not interfere with the immune response to kitten vaccination series. Parasitic infection (at least with <i>T cati</i>, <i>C felis</i> and <i>Capillaria</i> species) is therefore not a reason to postpone important vaccinations.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Europe PMC: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39212546