PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Antibacterial effects of eye dyes used in veterinary care

By Ferreira, Thiago Alegre Coelho et al.·Published in Veterinary Ophthalmology·2020·Comparative Ophthalmology Lab (LABOCO) Curitiba Brazil, Brazil·View original on Crossref

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Antimicrobial activity of topical dyes used in clinical veterinary ophthalmology

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A study tested the antibacterial effects of three eye dyes—fluorescein, rose bengal, and lissamine green—against bacteria that can cause eye infections in pets. The dyes were found to effectively kill certain bacteria, especially the preservative-free versions of rose bengal and lissamine green, which worked against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. However, preservative-free fluorescein only inhibited Gram-positive bacteria. The findings suggest that eye samples for bacterial culture should be taken before using these dyes, as they can affect test results. Proper handling and storage of these dyes can help prevent bacterial growth for up to 28 days.

People also search for: dog eye infection treatment · cat eye drops antibacterial · fluorescein dye for pets

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate in vitro the antibacterial effects of fluorescein, rose bengal, and lissamine green topical ophthalmic dyes against selected Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria, and to evaluate whether preserved or preservative‐free fluorescein solutions are able to inhibit or potentiate bacterial growth.ProceduresSusceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby‐Bauer disk diffusion method plated with clinical ocular isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, Streptococcus spp., Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bacterial growth inhibition was evaluated 24 hours following the addition of commercially available fluorescein, rose bengal, and lissamine green sterile strips. Antimicrobial effectiveness testing was performed by inoculation of compounded 1% dye solutions, both with and without preservatives (fluorescein and lissamine contained thiomersal, and rose bengal contained nipagin and nepazol), with the five previously mentioned bacteria. Growth was evaluated at days 7, 14, and 28.ResultsAll dyes showed antibacterial activity against Gram‐positive organisms. Preservative‐free compounded 1% fluorescein solution inhibited growth of Gram‐positive organisms but not of Gram‐negative organisms. Preservative‐free rose bengal and lissamine green inhibited growth of both types of organisms.ConclusionsPreferably, ocular surface samples for antimicrobial culture should be taken prior to the administration of topical dyes, due to their potential antibacterial activity, particularly if undiluted strips are applied directly or commercial fluorescein solutions are used and not immediately rinsed. Ophthalmic dye solutions containing preservative are safe from bacterial growth for up to 28 days if properly handled and stored. The use of preservative‐free fluorescein solutions should be avoided and preservative‐free rose bengal and lissamine green should be handled carefully.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on Crossref: https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.12746