Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Antimicrobial use helps prevent infections after clean dog bone
By Välkki, Kirsi Johanna et al.·Published in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica·2020·Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Antimicrobial prophylaxis is considered sufficient to preserve an acceptable surgical site infection rate in clean orthopaedic and neurosurgeries in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study looked at dogs undergoing clean orthopedic and neurosurgeries to see if giving antibiotics before surgery helped prevent infections. Most dogs received the recommended antibiotic, cefazolin, before their procedures, and the overall infection rate was low at 6.3%. Interestingly, not giving antibiotics did not seem to increase the risk of infection. The researchers found that certain factors, like carrying a specific resistant bacteria and having a higher body temperature, could increase the risk of infection. Overall, giving antibiotics before surgery without continuing them afterward was enough to keep infection rates low.
People also search for: dog surgery infection prevention · antibiotics for dog surgery · orthopedic surgery infection rate in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. To lower the incidence of SSI, antimicrobial prophylaxis is given 30-60 min before certain types of surgeries in both human and veterinary patients. However, due to the increasing concern of antimicrobial resistance, the benefit of antimicrobial prophylaxis in clean orthopaedic and neurosurgeries warrants investigation. The aims of this retrospective cross-sectional study were to review the rate of SSI and evaluate the compliance with antimicrobial guidelines in dogs at a veterinary teaching hospital in 2012-2016. In addition, possible risk factors for SSI were assessed. RESULTS: Nearly all dogs (377/406; 92.9%) received antimicrobial prophylaxis. Twenty-nine dogs (7.1%) did not receive any antimicrobials and only four (1.1%) received postoperative antimicrobials. The compliance with in-house and national protocols was excellent regarding the choice of prophylactic antimicrobial (cefazolin), but there was room for improvement in the timing of prophylaxis administration. Follow-up data was available for 89.4% (363/406) of the dogs. Mean follow-up time was 464 days (range: 3-2600 days). The overall SSI rate was 6.3%: in orthopaedic surgeries it was 6.7%, and in neurosurgeries it was 4.2%. The lowest SSI rates (0%) were seen in extracapsular repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture, ulnar ostectomy, femoral head and neck excision, arthrotomy and coxofemoral luxation repair. The highest SSI rate (25.0%) was seen in arthrodesis. Omission of antimicrobials did not increase the risk for SSI (P = 0.56; OR 1.7; CI0.4-5.0). Several risk factors for SSI were identified, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius carriage (P = 0.02; OR 9.0; CI1.4-57.9) and higher body temperature (P = 0.03; OR 1.69; CI1.0-2.7; mean difference + 0.4 °C compared to dogs without SSI). CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial prophylaxis without postoperative antimicrobials is sufficient to maintain the overall rate of SSI at a level similar to published data in canine clean orthopedic and neurosurgeries.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32943076/