Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Antimicrobial use practices, attitudes and responsibilities in UK farm animal veterinary surgeons.
- Journal:
- Preventive veterinary medicine
- Year:
- 2018
- Authors:
- Coyne, L A et al.
- Affiliation:
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health · United Kingdom
Plain-English summary
This study looked at how veterinarians in the UK who work with pigs prescribe antibiotics and their thoughts on antibiotic resistance, which is when bacteria become resistant to medications. Out of 261 surveyed veterinarians, only 61 responded, and while they felt confident in their own prescribing practices, they worried that their peers might not be as careful. Many veterinarians didn't see treatment failures in their own cases as linked to antibiotic resistance, but they thought it was a problem for others. They often consulted various resources for guidance, but sometimes found conflicting advice on responsible prescribing. Overall, the veterinarians wanted to find ways to prevent disease without relying on antibiotics, but they didn't frequently use diagnostic tests to help make their prescribing decisions. The study suggests that future efforts should focus on improving how antibiotics are used in pigs while considering the changing landscape of veterinary medicine.
Abstract
Increasing levels of antimicrobial resistance in human and veterinary medicine have raised concerns around the issue of overprescribing and the indiscriminate use of antimicrobials. Their use in food producing animals is under scrutiny due to the perceived risk from the zoonotic transfer of resistant pathogens from animals to humans. This study aimed to explore UK veterinary surgeons antimicrobial prescribing behaviours, their attitudes to antimicrobial resistance and their perceptions of responsibility of antimicrobial use in pigs through a questionnaire study on a census sample of 261 veterinary surgeons in England, Wales and Scotland who had a clinical caseload which included commercial pigs. The questionnaire had a useable response rate of 34.1% (n = 61/179) in eligible veterinary surgeons. Overall, veterinary surgeons reported personal confidence that their prescribing decisions were responsible however, there was concern that the prescribing behaviours of other veterinary surgeons and physicians in human medicine may be less responsible; a sociological concept known as 'othering'. In parallel, veterinary surgeons seldom identified that treatment failure was a consequence of antimicrobial resistance in their own clinical caseload, however they considered it an issue for other veterinary surgeons and for human prescribers. Veterinary surgeons consulted a wide spectrum of resources on antimicrobial use in pigs which, on occasion, contained conflicting guidance on what was defined as responsible prescribing. The decision over whether or not to prescribe an antimicrobial was influenced by numerous factors relating to the veterinary surgeons' experience and the clinical situation presented, but maintaining pig welfare was a high priority. There was a shared desire to seek alternative methods to prevent disease to antimicrobial use, however the use of diagnostics to support prescribing decisions was an infrequently reported behaviour and could play a more significant role in prescriber decisions if more cost effective and rapid tests were available. Future interventions to optimise antimicrobial use in pigs needs to focus on the evolution of antimicrobial use practices in a changing political and scientific landscape whilst also considering individual motivations and justifications for use.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30466652/