Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Oxidative stress and antioxidants in dogs with heart failure
By Freeman, Lisa M et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2005·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Antioxidant status and biomarkers of oxidative stress in dogs with congestive heart failure.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with congestive heart failure (CHF) showed changes in their antioxidant levels and signs of oxidative stress compared to healthy dogs. Specifically, the dogs with CHF had higher levels of certain stress markers and lower levels of vitamin E and a key antioxidant (GSH) that helps protect cells. While some vitamins like C were higher in the CHF dogs, the overall balance of antioxidants was off. This suggests that dogs with CHF may benefit from dietary changes to improve their antioxidant status, but more research is needed to confirm this.
People also search for: dog heart failure symptoms · congestive heart failure treatment for dogs · antioxidants for dogs with heart disease
Abstract
Alterations in antioxidant status and oxidative stress have been documented in dogs with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The purpose of this study was to more broadly assess this relationship in dogs with congestive heart failure (CHF). Malondialdehyde (MDA), 8-F(2alpha)-isoprostane, protein carbonyls, reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) glutathione, vitamins A, C, and E, and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) were measured from a single venous blood sample from dogs with CHF secondary to DCM or chronic valvular disease (CVD) and in healthy controls. Nineteen dogs with CHF (14 CVD and 5 DCM) and 12 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Concentrations of 8-F(2alpha)-isoprostane (CHF: 44.6 pg/mL [range, 27.1-98.0 pg/mL], controls: 25.3 pg/ mL [range, 11.1-80.4 pg/mL]) but not MDA (CHF: 4.11 microM [range, 1.89-6.39 microM], controls: 3.88 microM [range, 2.14-4.72 microM]) or protein carbonyls (0.69 nmol/mg protein [range, 0.37-1.67 nmol/mg protein], controls: 0.80 nmol/mg protein [range, 0.40-1.14 nmol/mg protein]) were significantly higher in the dogs with CHF than in the controls. Vitamin E concentration (CHF: 2,215 microg/ dL [range, 916-3,499 microg/dL], controls: 2,820 microg/dL [range, 1,738-3,775 microg/dL]) and GSH:GSSG (CHF: 12.0 [range, 3.69-30.1], controls: 22.7 [range, 12.5-227]) were significantly lower, whereas ORAC (CHF: 824 micromol Trolox equivalent/L [range, 304-984], controls: 497 micromol Trolox equivalent/L [range, 258-759]) and vitamin C (CHF: 0.90 mg/dL [range, 0.55-2.02 mg/dL], controls: 0.72 mg/dL [range, 0.43-0.85 mg/dL]) concentrations were higher in dogs with CHF than in controls. Vitamin A concentrations were not different between dogs with CHF and controls. No differences in any of the parameters were detected between dogs with DCM versus those with CVD. Some antioxidant defenses are decreased in dogs with CHF, and some biomarkers of oxidative stress are increased in dogs with CHF. The effect of dietary interventions to correct this imbalance in antioxidant defenses warrants further study.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16095171/