PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Tear tests for dry eye in brachycephalic dogs

By Voitena, Jéssica N et al.·Published in Veterinary research communications·2024·Department of Veterinary Surgery, Brazil·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Application of OSA-VETand qualiquantitative tear tests in brachycephalic dogs with and without keratoconjunctivitis sicca.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of brachycephalic dogs, including some with varying degrees of keratoconjunctivitis sicca (a condition causing dry eyes), underwent several eye tests to assess their tear production and eye health. The tests included both new technology (OSA-Vet) and traditional methods. While the OSA-Vet device provided useful information, it didn't always match the results of the conventional tests. The study found significant differences in tear production between healthy dogs and those with dry eye conditions, indicating that both types of tests can help evaluate eye health in these breeds.

People also search for: brachycephalic dog eye problems · keratoconjunctivitis sicca treatment · dry eyes in dogs · OSA-Vet eye test for dogs

Abstract

The aim was to compare the outcomes acquired from the OSA-Vetdevice with conventional quantitative and qualitative tear tests and between groups within each test, in brachycephalic dogs both healthy and those diagnosed with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. The dogs were divided into four groups: healthy dogs (HD), with mild KCS (MIKCS); moderate KCS (MOKCS); severe KCS (SKCS). All patients underwent ocular surface diagnostic examination in the following order, with a 10-minute interval between tests: non-invasive tear film breakup time (TBUTNI - OSA-Vet), tear meniscus height (TMH-OSA-Vet), meniscometry (I-Teartest), Schirmer Tear Test-1 (STT-1), and tear film breakup time (TBUT). Kruskal-Wallis H tests were performed to establish the difference between the groups and Spearman&#xb4;s correlation coefficient test to assess the correlation between tests. And an analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test was performed for TMH. Results with (p&#x2009;<.05) were considered statistically significant. The correlation of conventional tests in relation to those obtained by OSA-Vetproved to be low, except between TBUTNI (OSA-Vet) and TBUT in MOKCS, with a strong correlation (r&#x2009;=.925). In the comparison between TBUTNI (OSA-Vet) and TBUT in MIKCS the correlation was moderate (r&#x2009;=.547) as well as STT-1 and I-Teartest in MOKCS (r&#x2009;=.416). In the comparison between groups, the main result observed was a significant difference between all the KCS groups and HD, in the TBUT and TBUTNI (OSA-Vet) test. The OSA-Vetand conventional tests are useful for evaluating the ocular surface of brachycephalic dogs. However, the OSA-Vetdoes not correlate well with conventional standardized tests.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39589642/