Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
What affects decisions and outcomes for dogs with sudden belly
By Menard, Jenna V et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2023·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Assessing major influences on decision-making and outcome for dogs presenting emergently with nontraumatic hemoabdomen.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 132 dogs with nontraumatic hemoabdomen (bleeding in the abdomen not caused by an injury) were studied to understand what factors influenced their owners' treatment decisions. Most owners prioritized their dog's quality of life when deciding on treatment, with many choosing surgery over palliative care or euthanasia. Dogs that had surgery lived longer, with a median survival time of about 213 days compared to just 39 days for those receiving palliative care. Owners who opted for surgery reported higher satisfaction with their decision. This highlights the importance of discussing treatment options and outcomes clearly with pet owners.
People also search for: dog bleeding in abdomen treatment · dog surgery for hemoabdomen · quality of life for dogs with cancer
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors contributing to owner decision-making, satisfaction, and perception of quality of life (QOL) with treatment of dogs with nontraumatic hemoabdomen (NTH). ANIMALS: 132 client-owned dogs. PROCEDURES: An electronic survey was administered to owners of 436 dogs that presented emergently with NTH to a single institution between January 2015 and May 2022. Following survey response, retrospective data collection was performed. RESULTS: Owners reported QOL as the most important factor influencing their decision-making (92%), followed by risk of cancer (57%) or time remaining with their pet (56%). QOL scores were significantly higher with surgery versus those with palliative care (P = .007). Median survival time (MST) was 213 days with surgery and 39 days with palliative care (P = .049). Survival benefit of surgery was lost when considering only dogs with malignant histopathology (MST, 81 days; P = .305). Owners were more likely to be satisfied when they chose surgery over either euthanasia or palliative care (P = .039). Thirty-four owners (26%) second-guessed or were unsure of their decision. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgery resulted in the longest MST with greater perceived QOL and owner satisfaction compared with both palliative care and euthanasia and should therefore be considered highly. The importance of malignancy and survival time on owners' decisions, along with the negative impact of metastasis on survival, underscores the importance of timely preoperative staging. The rate of second-guessing highlights the need for standardization of NTH discussions including treatment options and potential outcomes in order to effectively and efficiently guide treatment of patients with this common presentation.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37116877/