Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Using a continuous passive motion device after dog knee surgery
By Erazo, A et al.·Published in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2024·University of Saskatchewan, Canada·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Assessment of a continuous passive motion assistive device in dogs following stifle surgery.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of four dogs who had surgery on their left knee (stifle) were tested with a special device that helps move their legs gently to improve recovery. The device was designed to help the dogs regain their range of motion after surgery, and it worked well for extending their legs, although it didn't help with bending as much. The dogs received four sessions with the device at different speeds, and it was found to be safe and effective. This device could be a helpful option for dog owners who want to assist their pets with rehabilitation at home, especially if they are not comfortable with manual therapy.
People also search for: dog knee surgery recovery · stifle surgery rehabilitation for dogs · continuous passive motion device for dogs
Abstract
Canine rehabilitation optimizes recovery and the quality of life in dogs with musculoskeletal conditions or after surgery. Achieving proper range of motion (ROM) is vital post-stifle surgery, often accomplished through manual therapy and active exercises. We investigated the mechanical performance of a continuous passive motion (CPM) device for dogs and its potential use in canine rehabilitation therapy. In the ethical review process, our research was accepted to be evaluated in a sample of four dogs that had undergone left stifle surgery. Each dog underwent four sessions with the device at three different speeds. Results showed the device replicated extension angles close to goniometer measurements used in manual therapy. Flexion was also achieved, but not to the same extent. A force threshold stopped the device, avoiding discomfort in dogs with restricted ROM. Dog-specific factors like body position, opposition to movement, limb size, stage of recovery, haircoat, and discomfort, appeared to influence device operation. Mechanical improvements to allow for enhanced flexion are recommended in future CPM device designs, including a resistance threshold that could be adjusted for individual dogs and stages of healing. This study serves as a foundation for future advancements in canine rehabilitation systems. A canine CPM device may provide an affordable option to improve ROM. This could be beneficial for dog owners, who may not be comfortable with manual therapy, to assist with home rehabilitation exercises.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38849025/