PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Infectious organisms found in cats with chronic nasal inflammation

By Johnson, Lynelle R et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2005·Department of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Assessment of infectious organisms associated with chronic rhinosinusitis in cats.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A group of cats with chronic nasal congestion and discharge (chronic rhinosinusitis) were tested for various infectious organisms. The study found that bacteria were present more often in the nasal samples of these affected cats compared to healthy cats, with some showing signs of Mycoplasma infection. Interestingly, while feline herpesvirus type 1 (FHV-1) DNA was found in some cats, it was not detected in a way that indicated active infection. This suggests that bacterial infections may play a significant role in chronic nasal issues in cats.

People also search for: cat nasal congestion treatment · chronic rhinosinusitis in cats · feline herpesvirus symptoms · Mycoplasma infection in cats

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine detection rates for feline herpesvirus type 1 (FHV-1), Mycoplasma spp, fungi, and bacteria in flush samples and biopsy specimens from the nasal cavities of cats with and without chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). DESIGN: Prospective study. ANIMALS: 10 CRS-affected cats and 7 cats without signs of respiratory tract disease. PROCEDURES: Nasal flush samples and biopsy specimens were collected from all cats for bacterial (aerobic and anaerobic), fungal, and mycoplasmal cultures; additional biopsy specimens were collected for virus isolation and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay (to detect FHV-1 DNA). RESULTS: Aerobic bacteria were detected in flush samples from 5 of 7 control cats; culture of flush samples from CRS-affected cats yielded aerobic bacteria (9/10 cats), anaerobic bacteria (3/10), and Mycoplasma spp (2/10). No fungal organisms were isolated from any cat. Potential pathogens were isolated significantly more often from CRS-affected cats than from control cats. Bacterial culture of biopsy specimens yielded aerobic bacteria (2/7 control cats and 4/10 CRS-affected cats) and anaerobic bacteria (2/10 CRS-affected cats). Although FHV-1 was not detected in nasal biopsy specimens from control or CRS-affected cats, FHV-1 DNA was detected via PCR assay in specimens from 4 of 7 control cats and 3 of 10 CRS-affected cats. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Compared with findings in control cats, anaerobic bacteria, Mycoplasma spp, and a variety of potentially pathogenic organisms were detected more commonly in samples from cats with CRS. In both groups, FHV-1 was detected via PCR assay as a nonviable organism or in noncultivable amounts.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16117066/