Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Using F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT to Check Dog Bone Implants
By Vincek, Anna et al.·Published in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association·2025·Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Assessment of Orthopedic Surgical Implants in Dogs UsingF-Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A dog with an orthopedic implant was evaluated using a special imaging technique called F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT to check for potential issues. Out of 39 implants assessed, 24 showed no problems, while 15 had signs of increased activity that could indicate complications. The most concerning finding was linked to a total hip replacement that had confirmed infection. This study suggests that while many implants are functioning well, increased activity around an implant could signal a problem, and further investigation may be needed if symptoms arise.
People also search for: dog orthopedic implant problems · dog hip replacement infection · signs of implant failure in dogs
Abstract
Failure of fixation is a potential complication associated with surgical implants, and early detection is important but challenging. Positron emission tomography (PET) has the potential to detect lesions that may exhibit little to no visible findings on other commonly used diagnostic imaging modalities. The aim of this retrospective descriptive study was to assessF-Sodium Fluoride (F-NaF) uptake associated with surgical implants in dogs. Medical records were searched for canine patients with orthopedic metallic implants in place imaged withF-NaF PET/CT. PET images were reviewed blinded to clinical history, with each surgical implant assessed for the presence of increased radiopharmaceutical uptake (IRU). IRU was graded subjectively regarding the severity (absent, mild, moderate, severe) and the extent area (focal, multifocal, extensive), and objectively by measuring maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax). Seven patients were included, with a total of 39 metallic implants used in eight surgical procedures (three total hip replacements, three humeral fractures, one tibial plateau leveling osteotomy, and one tibial tuberosity advancement). In 24 of 39 implants (62%), no IRU was displayed. Fifteen implants (38%) displayed IRU (five mild, five moderate, five severe). The highest SUVmax (24) was associated with confirmed sepsis of a total hip replacement implant. The remaining implants with severe IRU were articular implants with associated marked degenerative joint pathology. This study confirms that most implants displayed no IRU withF-NaF PET. The presence of implant-associated IRU may indicate implant failure; however, IRU may also be due to regional bone pathology, including both degenerative joint disease and sepsis.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40375056/