Assessment of prehospital care in canine trauma patients presented to Veterinary Trauma Centers: A VetCOT registry study.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the epidemiology of veterinary care in canine trauma patients prior to presentation to a Veterinary Trauma Center (VTC). DESIGN: Retrospective observational cross-sectional study. METHODS: &#xa0;Retrospective descriptive analysis from&#xa0;22,998 canine case&#xa0;records from the Veterinary Trauma Registry from September 2013 through April 2018. Analysis was focused on the type of injury, care provider, and care provided prior presentation to a VTC (pre-VTC care). A log-likelihood ratio test was used to test for association of outcome and pre-VTC care. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare modified Glasgow Coma Scale and Animal Trauma Triage (ATT) scores between pre-VTC&#xa0;and non-pre-VTC care&#xa0;groups. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pre-VTC care was provided in 5636 out of 22,998 dogs (24.5%) by veterinarians (81%), owners (19.6%), and first responders (0.03%). The most common nonveterinary interventions included wound care and bandaging in 42% and 39% of the patients, respectively. Mortality was higher in the pre-VTC care group (8.7% vs 7.5%); dogs receiving pre-VTC care were 1.5 times&#xa0;(95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.88) more likely to die and 1.2 times (95% CI, 1.07-1.37) more likely to be euthanized. The ATT scores were significantly higher in dogs receiving pre-VTC care (mean = 2.53&#xa0;vs 1.78; p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that the majority of more severely injured dogs receiving pre-VTC care obtained care by a veterinarian. Dogs receiving pre-VTC care possessed a greater mortality rate but also a greater ATT score; therefore, mortality rate is more likely related to severity of trauma rather than reception of pre-VTC care. We propose that these data should prompt further research and education about prehospital care in veterinary medicine.