Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Genetic variations in Toll-like receptors linked to canine nasal
By Mercier, Elise et al.·Published in BMC veterinary research·2014·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Assessment of Toll-like receptor 2, 4 and 9 SNP genotypes in canine sino-nasal aspergillosis.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with sino-nasal aspergillosis (a fungal infection affecting the nasal passages) was studied to see if certain genetic variations in their immune system might be linked to the disease. Researchers looked at nine dogs of different breeds and found some genetic changes, but when comparing 31 affected dogs to 31 healthy dogs, they didn’t find any significant differences. This suggests that these specific genetic changes may not play a role in causing sino-nasal aspergillosis in dogs, although the immune system could still be involved in the disease.
People also search for: dog nasal infection treatment · sino-nasal aspergillosis in dogs · immune system issues in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The exact aetiology of canine sino-nasal aspergillosis (SNA) is unknown. In man, dysfunction in innate immunity, particularly in the function of pattern recognition receptors, is implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory sino-nasal disease and in fungal diseases. Associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and these diseases have been identified. Similarly, in dogs SNPs in genes encoding TLRs may be important in the pathogenesis of SNA. The aims of the present study were (1) to identify the presence of non-synonymous SNPs in the coding regions of the TLR2, 4 and 9 genes in dogs suffering from SNA, and (2) to investigate the SNP genotypes in dogs with SNA compared with a control population. RESULTS: Direct sequencing of nine dogs of various breeds with SNA revealed two non-synonymous SNPs in the coding region of TLR2, eight in TLR4 and four in TLR9. These non-synonymous SNPs were further evaluated in a case-control study of affected Golden Retrievers, Labrador Retrievers, Rottweilers and Beaucerons. Genotyping was performed using a combination of allele-specific primers and hydrolysis probe assays in 31 dogs with SNA and 31 controls. No significant difference in minor allele frequency was identified between these groups, for all studied SNPs, in any of the four breeds. CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not support a role for non-synonymous SNPs in the TLR 2, 4 and 9 coding regions in the pathogenesis of canine SNA, but do not exclude a role for innate immunity in the pathogenesis of the disease.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25266752/