Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Do dogs with lower respiratory signs always need antibiotics based
By Lebastard, Matthieu et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2022·Centre Hospitalier Vé, France·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Association between quantitative bacterial culture of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and antibiotic requirement in dogs with lower respiratory tract signs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 33 dogs with breathing problems were studied to see if the number of bacteria found in their lung fluid could predict whether they needed antibiotics. The researchers found that the amount of bacteria present didn't reliably indicate if the dogs had a serious infection that required treatment. In fact, both groups of dogs—those needing antibiotics and those that didn't—had similar levels of bacteria. This suggests that simply counting bacteria in lung fluid isn't a good way to decide on antibiotic treatment for dogs with respiratory issues.
People also search for: dog breathing problems treatment · dog lung infection antibiotics · why does my dog cough and wheeze
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Historically, positive bacterial cultures from the lower respiratory tract (LRT) have been considered clinically relevant when quantitative bacterial cultures of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were >1700 colony forming units (cfu)/mL. However, this threshold might not accurately predict a requirement for antibiotics. OBJECTIVES: To study whether quantitative BALF bacterial culture results were predictive of antibiotic requirement in dogs with LRT signs. ANIMALS: Thirty-three client-owned dogs. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. Dogs with positive quantitative bacterial culture of BALF were included. Dogs were divided into 2 groups, depending on whether they had a LRT infection requiring antibiotics (LRTI-RA) or LRT disease not requiring antibiotics (LRTD-NRA), based on thoracic imaging features, presence of intracellular bacteria on BALF cytology, and response to treatment. Predictive effect of cfu/mL and BALF total nucleated cell count (TNCC) on antibiotic requirement, adjusting for ongoing or prior antibiotic therapy and age, were studied using logistic regression. RESULTS: Twenty-two and 11 dogs were included in the LRTI-RA and LRTD-NRA groups, respectively. The cfu/mL was not significantly predictive of antibiotic requirement, independent of ongoing or prior antibiotic treatment and age (LRTI-RA: median, 10 000 cfu/mL; range, 10-3 × 10; LRTD-NRA: median, 10  000 cfu/mL; range, 250-1.3 × 10; P = .27). The TNCC was not significantly predictive of antibiotic requirement when only dogs with bronchial disease were considered (LRTI-RA: median, 470 cells/μL; range, 240-2260; LRTD-NRA: median, 455 cells/μL; range, 80-4990; P = .57). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The cfu/mL is an inappropriate measure for determining whether antibiotics are of benefit in dogs with LRT signs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35616218/