Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Skin pH, temperature, and bacteria in dogs with paw inflammation
By Breathnach, Rory M et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2011·University College Dublin School of Agriculture·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Association between skin surface pH, temperature and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in dogs with immunomodulatory-responsive lymphocytic-plasmacytic pododermatitis.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with a skin condition called immunomodulatory-responsive lymphocytic-plasmacytic pododermatitis (ImR-LPP) often developed secondary infections caused by a bacteria known as Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Researchers found that the skin pH was slightly higher in these dogs compared to healthy dogs, and the bacteria were present more frequently in the affected areas. However, skin temperature did not show significant differences, and changes in pH and temperature were not linked to the disease or the bacteria's presence. This suggests that the bacterial infection is likely a result of the skin condition rather than a cause.
People also search for: dog paw skin infection · Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in dogs · dog pododermatitis treatment · why is my dog licking his paws · dog skin pH levels
Abstract
Secondary bacterial infection is a frequent complication in lesional skin of dogs with immunomodulatory-responsive lymphocytic-plasmacytic pododermatitis (ImR-LPP). However, the influence of skin pH and temperature in determining the composition of the cutaneous microflora at lesional sites has not been investigated. The association between ImR-LPP and pedal skin temperature, pH and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates was thus evaluated. Temperature and pH were measured in 20 dogs with ImR-LPP and in 30 clinically healthy control dogs, and S. pseudintermedius was cultured from interdigital and palmoplantar swabs in both groups and scored semi-quantitatively for bacterial growth. In the ImR-LPP group, mean skin pH was slightly, but significantly, higher at both interdigital and palmoplantar sites. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius was isolated more frequently, and scores for bacterial growth were also significantly higher. However, mean skin temperatures were not significantly different from those in the control group. The isolation of S. pseudintermedius was significantly associated with ImR-LPP, with the single exception of isolates on Columbia blood agar from the palmoplantar region. However, pH and temperature were not significantly associated with the disease, and were not associated with the isolation of S. pseudintermedius at most sites sampled. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius was not isolated from all feet sampled in dogs with ImR-LPP. Taken together, these data would suggest that S. pseudintermedius infection is most likely to be a secondary phenomenon in dogs with ImR-LPP, and that changes in skin pH and temperature are not significant risk factors for this disease.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21395884/