Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Serum SDMA levels linked to inflammation in cats
By Cattaneo, Giulia et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2025·Department of Veterinary Medicine, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Association of Serum Symmetric Dimethylarginine Concentrations and Inflammation in Cats.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 28 cats was studied to see if a substance called symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) was higher in cats with inflammation, indicated by elevated serum amyloid A (SAA) levels. The results showed that SDMA levels were not significantly different between cats with high SAA and those with normal levels. However, cats with elevated SAA had lower levels of urea and creatinine, which are waste products that can indicate kidney function. This suggests that while SDMA may not be a reliable marker for inflammation in these cases, it could still provide useful information about kidney function when other factors are controlled.
People also search for: cat inflammation symptoms · elevated SAA in cats · SDMA levels in cats · cat kidney function tests · what does SDMA mean in cats
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Serum symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) concentrations are higher in some hyperthyroid cats with normal renal function, presumably due to increased protein catabolism. OBJECTIVES: To investigate if SDMA is higher in cats with inflammation (defined as elevated serum amyloid A [SAA]). ANIMALS: Twenty-eight cats: 12 with elevated SAA concentrations (> 3.9 μg/mL) and 16 with normal SAA. METHODS: Retrospective case control study. Cats presenting to a referral institution between 2016 and 2022 with a documented SAA were identified. Individuals with renal and extrarenal factors known to affect SDMA were excluded. SDMA was measured from stored serum samples. Comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney U test, and correlations assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Data are presented as median [minimum-maximum]. RESULTS: SDMA was not significantly different between cats with elevated SAA and normal SAA (11 [5-17] μg/dL vs. 13 [9-21] μg/dL, respectively; p = 0.28). There was no correlation between SDMA and SAA (r = -0.105; p = 0.594) or serum TT4 concentrations (r = -0.023; p = 0.906). No difference in age or USG was present between elevated SAA and normal SAA groups (p = 0.908 and p = 0.165, respectively). Serum urea and creatinine concentrations were both significantly lower in cats with elevated SAA compared to those with normal SAA (6.3 [3.6-8.8] mmol/L vs. 8.4 [6.2-10.5] mmol/L; p = 0.008, and 96 [62-129] μmol/L vs. 118 [90-147] μmol/L; p = 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: SDMA might be a more representative biomarker of GFR during inflammatory states, provided other confounding factors that affect SDMA are eliminated.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40008808/