Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Blood test changes linked to Bartonella infection in cats
By Williams, Maggie et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2022·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Associations between presence of Bartonella species deoxyribonucleic acid and complete blood cell count and serum biochemical changes in client-owned cats.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 3,964 cats were tested for Bartonella infection, which is common and can cause fever and other symptoms. Out of these, 127 cats tested positive for Bartonella DNA, mostly from areas with high flea populations and many were already sick. The study found that young cats with fever and high white blood cell counts were more likely to have this infection, but there were not many significant changes in their blood tests otherwise. If your cat has an unexplained fever, especially if it's young and lives in a flea-prone area, Bartonella infection might be something your vet considers.
People also search for: cat fever causes · young cat with high white blood cell count · Bartonella infection in cats
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infection with Bartonella species is common in cats but reported effects of bacteremia on laboratory variables differ. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate for associations between Bartonella bacteremia and CBC and serum biochemical changes in sick and healthy cats throughout the United States. ANIMALS: A total of 3964 client-owned cats. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using submissions to a commercial laboratory between 2011 and 2017. Serum biochemistry and CBC abnormalities (categorized as above or below reference intervals), age, and location (high- or low-risk state for Ctenocephalides felis) in presumed healthy and sick cats were evaluated for associations with presence of Bartonella spp. DNA, detected by PCR. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Bartonella spp. DNA was amplified from 127 (3.2%) of 3964 cats; 126 (99.2%) of 127 were from high flea risk states and 121 (95.3%) of 127 were presumed sick. Fever of unknown origin was the most common PCR panel requested. In the multivariable analysis, neutrophilia, decreased ALP activity, clinical status (presumed sick), and young age (≤2 years) each were positively associated whereas neutropenia and hyperproteinemia both were negatively associated with Bartonella spp. bacteremia. Presence of Bartonella spp. DNA had no association with test results for other infectious disease agents. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: In both healthy and sick cats, active Bartonella infections had minimal association with clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities. However, based on these results, in areas considered high risk for C. felis, active infection with Bartonella spp. is a reasonable differential diagnosis for cats presented with unexplained fever and neutrophilia, particularly if the cat is young.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35132685/