PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Auditory midbrain implant: histomorphologic effects of long-term implantation and electric stimulation of a new deep brain stimulation array.

Journal:
Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
Year:
2007
Authors:
Lenarz, Minoo et al.
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology · Germany
Species:
cat

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Chronic implantation and electric stimulation with a human prototype auditory midbrain implant (AMI) array within the inferior colliculus achieves minimal neuronal damage and does not cause any severe complications. BACKGROUND: An AMI array has been developed for patients with neural deafness and, based on animal studies, has shown to possess potential as an auditory prosthesis in humans. To investigate the safety of the AMI for clinical use, we characterized the histomorphologic effects of chronic implantation and stimulation within its target structure, the inferior colliculus. METHODS: Eight cats were chronically implanted for 3 months, and histologic sections were analyzed to assess long-term tissue effects. Four of the 8 cats were additionally stimulated for 60 days (4 h/d) starting 4 weeks after implantation to assess if clinically relevant stimuli further affected the tissue response. RESULTS: In general, both neurons and neuropil surrounding the implant track were apparently unaffected, whereas a fibrillary sheath (approximately 50 microm thick) developed around the array. There was a significant decrease in neuron density 50 to 100 microm away from the track with a significantly elevated number of glial cells out to approximately 250 to 350 microm. Chronic stimulation seemed to improve the tissue response and neuronal survival around the implant, although further studies are needed to confirm this finding. CONCLUSION: The histomorphologic effects and extent of neuronal damage observed for our AMI array are similar to those of other neural implants currently and safely used in humans. The minimal tissue damage surrounding the implanted array is encouraging with regard to the safety of the array for human use.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18043431/