PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Bacterial colonization of central venous catheters in dogs

By Francesca Perondi et al.·Published in Heliyon·2020·Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Livornese lato monte, San Piero a grado, 56122, Pisa, Italy; Corresponding author., GB·View original on DOAJ

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Bacterial colonization of non-permanent central venous catheters in hemodialysis dogs

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

Five out of 23 dogs undergoing hemodialysis developed bacterial infections related to their central venous catheters (CVCs), which are used for treatment. The most common bacteria found was Staphylococcus. Despite these infections, there was no significant difference in survival rates between the infected and non-infected dogs. The study suggests that maintaining good hygiene practices and using antiseptics like chlorhexidine can help reduce the risk of infection in dogs with CVCs during hemodialysis.

People also search for: dog hemodialysis infection · central venous catheter care for dogs · Staphylococcus in dogs · dog dialysis complications

Abstract

Non-permanent central venous catheters (CVCs), are the most commonly used vascular access in veterinary patients undergoing hemodialysis. In human dialysis patients, CVC infection represents a common cause of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to evaluate the prevalence of bacterial colonization of CVCs in dogs submitted to hemodialysis treatment at time of CVC removal.The CVCs of all dogs submitted to hemodialysis (n = 23) at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital ''Mario Modenato'' of the University of Pisa between January 2015 and December 2016 were considered. For all dogs, data regarding signalment, reason for hemodialysis treatment, duration of catheterization (≤15 or >15 days), CVC complications, and 30-day survival were considered. Statistical analysis was performed using Graph Pad Prism™. Five over 23 dogs (22%) showed positive bacterial culture of CVC (+), and 18/23 dogs (78%) negative culture of CVC (-). The most prevalent microorganism was Staphylococcus Spp (3/5; 60%). No significant difference was found in the prevalence of CVC infection according to age, gender, reason for hemodialysis, CVC complications, duration of catheterization, and outcome. No statistically significant difference (p = 0.64) in survival curves was reported at log rank analysis between dogs with CVC - and CVC +.The prevalence of bacterial CVC contamination in our dialysis dogs showed relatively low. Exclusive use of CVC for hemodialysis, good hygiene practice during CVC management, and use of chlorhexidine as an antiseptic should be strongly encouraged.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on DOAJ: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03224